Skip to content

Radial jets, calibrated labels and the free Maxwell comparison hierarchy

Shadow Theory and the Wilson Yang–Mills Construction: A Source–Readout Reconstruction

Radial jets, calibrated labels and the free Maxwell comparison hierarchy

From local coefficients to usable field labels. The first objects are finite Taylor coefficient spaces. Curl reads their linearized curvature, and radial reconstruction provides an explicit section on closed homogeneous two-forms. The Maxwell equation imposes a further condition on that curvature. Polynomial labels are then sampled by finite local cylinders, with calibrated coefficient maps and a free comparison hierarchy. Keeping polynomial position degree, engineering weight and field count distinct is necessary for the later detector and scaling arguments. The free hierarchy is a supplied comparison sector; its presence does not assert that the interacting hierarchy is free.

Before the detector on physical coefficient space can be constructed, the supplied construction builds the label algebra, its local lattice representatives, the calibrated coefficient changes and the complete free comparison hierarchy with its shell charges. This section gives that construction in full, from the radial Taylor variables to the elimination of higher-degree vector and angular defects; each subsection is followed by its source–readout formulation. The labels are the first place where the recovery problem is posed for fields and not only for measures: a label is a source record, its lattice cylinder is a realization, and its Taylor readings are the readout.

16.1 Radial Taylor variables and the free equation space

The jet variables in this chapter are Taylor coefficients, with the factorial already divided out. At
order j ≥0, a radial potential coefficient is a family Ai of symmetric (j + 1)-linear maps from
R4 to the real color space. Its associated homogeneous potential is ai(x) = Ai(x, . . . , x), and the
constraint is
X
Source page 252.
Searchable transcription
The jet variables in this chapter are Taylor coefficients, with the factorial already divided out. At
order j ≥0, a radial potential coefficient is a family Ai of symmetric (j + 1)-linear maps from
R4 to the real color space. Its associated homogeneous potential is ai(x) = Ai(x, . . . , x), and the
constraint is
X
i
xiai(x) = 0
for every x.
(RJ1)
Source page 252.
Searchable transcription
i
xiai(x) = 0
for every x.
(RJ1)

This finite-dimensional real space is the space called Taylor in Labels/Jet. Its polynomial-position degree is j + 1, its engineering weight is j + 2, and its field-count degree is one. Polynomial labels inherit their weight and field count by addition over their factors; constants have both degrees zero. Complex labels are obtained by complexification. No field equation has yet been imposed on these radial variables.

Define the curvature coefficient by the homogeneous polynomial

Qil(x) = ∂ial(x) −∂lai(x).
(RJ2)
Source page 253.
Searchable transcription
Qil(x) = ∂ial(x) −∂lai(x).
(RJ2)

On symmetric tensors this means freezing one input at ei, subtracting the reversed expression, and multiplying by j + 1. The curvature is antisymmetric and satisfies

∂aQbc + ∂bQca + ∂cQab = 0,
(RJ3)
Source page 253.
Searchable transcription
∂aQbc + ∂bQca + ∂cQab = 0,
(RJ3)

since the second derivatives commute. Conversely let Q be a homogeneous degree-j antisymmetric two-form satisfying (RJ3). Set

X
ai(x) =
1
j + 2
k
xkQki(x).
(RJ4)
Source page 253.
Searchable transcription
X
ai(x) =
1
j + 2
k
xkQki(x).
(RJ4)

Antisymmetry proves (RJ1). Differentiating (RJ4), subtracting the reversed derivatives, and using (RJ3) gives

∂ial −∂lai = 2Qil + P
k xk∂kQil
j + 2
= Qil,
Source page 253.
Searchable transcription
∂ial −∂lai = 2Qil + P
k xk∂kQil
j + 2
= Qil,
where the last equality is Euler’s identity for degree j. Conversely, for a radial potential, differen-
tiation of P
k xkak = 0 gives P
k xk∂iak = −ai. Hence P
k xkQki = (j + 1)ai + ai = (j + 2)ai. Thus
curl and (RJ4) are inverse linear maps. Equality of homogeneous diagonal polynomials implies
equality of their symmetric tensors by polarization, so these are identities of the coefficient spaces
themselves. These are the maps and inverse identities in Maxwell/Exterior.
The free solution space consists of those Q which additionally satisfy
X
Source page 253.
Searchable transcription
where the last equality is Euler’s identity for degree j. Conversely, for a radial potential, differen-
tiation of P
k xkak = 0 gives P
k xk∂iak = −ai. Hence P
k xkQki = (j + 1)ai + ai = (j + 2)ai. Thus
curl and (RJ4) are inverse linear maps. Equality of homogeneous diagonal polynomials implies
equality of their symmetric tensors by polarization, so these are identities of the coefficient spaces
themselves. These are the maps and inverse identities in Maxwell/Exterior.
The free solution space consists of those Q which additionally satisfy
X
a
∂aQab = 0
for every b.
(RJ5)
Source page 253.
Searchable transcription
a
∂aQab = 0
for every b.
(RJ5)

The free gauge-jet map sends this subspace to radial potentials by (RJ4). It is injective because curl is its left inverse. In particular, saying that a radial coefficient is in its range is exactly saying that its curvature satisfies the free equation (RJ5); Bianchi is already built in by (RJ2). Taking normalized Taylor coefficients of a smooth Maxwell solution on an open set preserves (RJ3) and (RJ5): differentiate these equations at the point, commute the derivatives, and divide by the Taylor factorial. Conversely the polynomial attached to an element of the solution space obeys these equations everywhere. This justifies the solution-jet substitutions used in the equation-ideal argument below.

Color conjugation acts on these coefficients by the adjoint action. A rotation g acts by

ai(x) 7−→
X
k
gikak(g−1x).
Source page 253.
Searchable transcription
ai(x) 7−→
X
k
gikak(g−1x).

The radial constraint, curl, Bianchi and (RJ5) are preserved, directly by orthogonality and the chain rule. Thus the reconstruction (RJ4) intertwines both actions. The polynomial ideal is the kernel of restriction from radial coefficients to this free solution range, taken at each finite degree horizon. A choice of projection onto that range is a finite-dimensional linear choice; the polynomial telescoping argument below shows explicitly how its kernel is generated by the linear equation coordinates. This explains both the projection Pj used there and the radial reconstruction used in the Gaussian covariance comparison.

Source–readout formulation. The radial Taylor variables are a normal form for a quotient, and the source–readout content of the subsection is the identification of that quotient with a concrete section. The source object is a homogeneous potential; the readout is its linearized curvature (RJ2); the fibre of the readout is the space of linearized gauge transformations; and the radial reconstruction (RJ4) is a section whose image is the radial gauge. The following theorem states this with the gauge parameter written explicitly; the explicit parameter is not printed in the supplied text and is verified in the proof.

Theorem 16.1 (Radial section of the curl readout). Let Aj be all homogeneous g-valued potentials of degree j +1 (no radial constraint), Qj the closed homogeneous two-forms of degree j, curl : Aj → Qj the map (RJ2) and ρ : Qj →Vj the map (RJ4). Then

1. ρ takes values in Vj, curl ρ = id on Qj and ρ curl = id on Vj;

2. for arbitrary a′ ∈Aj, ρ(curl a′) = a′ −∂λ with λ = (j + 2)−1 P
k xka′
k, a homogeneous scalar
of degree j + 2;
Source page 254.
Searchable transcription
2. for arbitrary a′ ∈Aj, ρ(curl a′) = a′ −∂λ with λ = (j + 2)−1 P
k xka′
k, a homogeneous scalar
of degree j + 2;

3. hence curl is onto, its fibres are the orbits of a′ 7→a′ + ∂λ, and Vj meets each orbit exactly once.

Proof. Antisymmetry of Q gives (RJ1) for ρQ.
Differentiating (RJ4), subtracting the reversed
derivative and using (RJ3), ∂ial −∂lai = [2Qil + P
k xk∂kQil]/(j + 2) = Qil by Euler’s identity in
degree j. For (2), P
k xk(∂ka′
i −∂ia′
k) = (j + 1)a′
i −∂i(P
k xka′
k) + a′
i, again by Euler’s identity,
which is (j + 2)(a′
i −∂iλ). If a′ is radial then λ = 0, which is the second half of (1). (3) follows:
two potentials with the same curl have the same image under ρ curl, so they differ by a gradient,
and a radial gradient ∂μ has x · ∂μ = (j + 2)μ = 0. Equality of homogeneous diagonal polynomials
is equality of symmetric tensors by polarization.
Source page 254.
Searchable transcription
Proof. Antisymmetry of Q gives (RJ1) for ρQ.
Differentiating (RJ4), subtracting the reversed
derivative and using (RJ3), ∂ial −∂lai = [2Qil + P
k xk∂kQil]/(j + 2) = Qil by Euler’s identity in
degree j. For (2), P
k xk(∂ka′
i −∂ia′
k) = (j + 1)a′
i −∂i(P
k xka′
k) + a′
i, again by Euler’s identity,
which is (j + 2)(a′
i −∂iλ). If a′ is radial then λ = 0, which is the second half of (1). (3) follows:
two potentials with the same curl have the same image under ρ curl, so they differ by a gradient,
and a radial gradient ∂μ has x · ∂μ = (j + 2)μ = 0. Equality of homogeneous diagonal polynomials
is equality of symmetric tensors by polarization.

The exactness class is quotient equivalence: potentials modulo the fibre are in bijection with closed two-forms, with ρ as inverse on the radial slice. The free equation space of the title is then a subspace of the readout space, and membership in it is a property of the curvature jet, independent of the potential chosen over it.

16.2 Polynomial labels, coherent frames and local sections

The polynomial variables in this construction are coordinates of real radial jets, rather than coordinates of arbitrary connections. Write Vj for the real space of radial homogeneous potentials of polynomial degree j + 1, described in (RJ1)–(RJ4), and choose a real basis of each Vj. If zj,a are its coordinate functions, the algebra of labels before imposing gauge invariance is

P = C[zj,a : j ≥0, 1 ≤a ≤dimR Vj].
(PF1)
Source page 254.
Searchable transcription
P = C[zj,a : j ≥0, 1 ≤a ≤dimR Vj].
(PF1)

Each polynomial uses finitely many variables. Its evaluation on a real jet J = (Jj)j≥0 substitutes the real coordinates of Jj, regarded as complex numbers. Such evaluations separate polynomials: reduce to the finitely many variables present, and successively use the fact that a nonzero one-variable polynomial cannot vanish at every real number. Give zj,a the bidegree (j + 2, 1). Thus the bidegree of a monomial zm is



X
j,a
(j + 2)mj,a,
X
j,a
mj,a
= (r, f).
(PF2)
Source page 254.
Searchable transcription


X
j,a
(j + 2)mj,a,
X
j,a
mj,a
= (r, f).
(PF2)

The first entry is engineering degree and the second is number of fields. The horizon-d label space consists of the adjoint-invariant polynomials whose monomials have r ≤d. It is finite dimensional: only variables of weight at most d occur and every exponent is at most d. Adjoint transformations and orthogonal transformations mix coordinates within a fixed Vj; therefore they preserve both entries of (PF2). Taking a homogeneous component preserves adjoint invariance and the horizon. Conjugation of coefficients preserves these spaces as well, because evaluation takes place on real jets.

There is a basis bi, with b0 = 1, consisting of real polynomials of individual bidegrees (ri, fi).
Indeed decompose into the finitely many bidegrees, and then into real and imaginary parts. The
resulting real homogeneous elements span the complex space; choose an independent spanning
subfamily containing 1. At successive horizons extend the previous independent family inside the
same spanning set. This gives coherent frames: previous basis elements remain present as elements,
although their nonzero index numbers need not remain fixed. The only elements with field number
zero are constants. Hence fi > 0 for i ̸= 0.
Coefficients c = (ci) mean the polynomial P
i cibi; use P
i |ci| as a coefficient norm. There are
two different scaling operations:
Searchable transcription
There is a basis bi, with b0 = 1, consisting of real polynomials of individual bidegrees (ri, fi).
Indeed decompose into the finitely many bidegrees, and then into real and imaginary parts. The
resulting real homogeneous elements span the complex space; choose an independent spanning
subfamily containing 1. At successive horizons extend the previous independent family inside the
same spanning set. This gives coherent frames: previous basis elements remain present as elements,
although their nonzero index numbers need not remain fixed. The only elements with field number
zero are constants. Hence fi > 0 for i ̸= 0.
Coefficients c = (ci) mean the polynomial P
i cibi; use P
i |ci| as a coefficient norm. There are
two different scaling operations:
Jj 7→hj+2Jj,
Jj 7→tJj.
(PF3)
Source page 255.
Searchable transcription
Jj 7→hj+2Jj,
Jj 7→tJj.
(PF3)
On bi these multiply the reading by hri and tfi, respectively. In particular coefficient scaling by
field number is the diagonal map ci 7→tfici, invertible for t ̸= 0, and fixes the unit. The coefficient
action of s ∈O(4) is obtained by applying the tensor action to P
i cibi and taking its coordinates.
This action is an action on the polynomial label space. Its compatibility with the physical quotient
requires the separate rotation argument below; it does not follow merely from this definition.
Here is the actual construction of a local lattice representative of each label. At horizon d put
Source page 255.
Searchable transcription
On bi these multiply the reading by hri and tfi, respectively. In particular coefficient scaling by
field number is the diagonal map ci 7→tfici, invertible for t ̸= 0, and fixes the unit. The coefficient
action of s ∈O(4) is obtained by applying the tensor action to P
i cibi and taking its coordinates.
This action is an action on the polynomial label space. Its compatibility with the physical quotient
requires the separate rotation argument below; it does not follow merely from this definition.
Here is the actual construction of a local lattice representative of each label. At horizon d put
AJ
i (x) =
X
j<d−1
Jji(x),
aJ,h
x,i (t) = hAJ
i (h(x + tei)).
(PF4)
Source page 255.
Searchable transcription
AJ
i (x) =
X
j<d−1
Jji(x),
aJ,h
x,i (t) = hAJ
i (h(x + tei)).
(PF4)

An empty sum is zero. Along this edge solve the matrix group equation

u(0) = 1,
u′(t) = u(t)aJ,h
x,i (t),
(PF5)
Source page 255.
Searchable transcription
u(0) = 1,
u′(t) = u(t)aJ,h
x,i (t),
(PF5)

where the color is embedded in the skew-adjoint matrix Lie algebra. Set the link equal to u(1). Ex- istence does not assume a global logarithm. In an exponential chart, differentiating log(exp b exp v) at v = 0 converts (PF5) to a smooth ordinary differential equation in b. Solve locally, left translate to any initial value, and glue. Solutions agreeing once agree throughout an overlapping interval: the derivative of uv∗is zero. The times reachable from zero form an open set with open complement, by the same local extension and gluing argument; connectedness of the real line gives the solution at every time. This also proves uniqueness.

For a finite collection of edges these links depend analytically on the finite jet J near zero. One
can see this without differentiating an infinite configuration map. The integral equation in matrix
path space is u = 1 + VJu, where VJ is integration followed by multiplication by the connection.
Near J = 0 its norm is less than one, so (1 −VJ)−1 = P
n≥0 Vn
J is analytic. Uniqueness identifies it
R 1
0 AJ
with (PF5). Differentiating at zero gives the edge tangent
i (x + tei) dt. Products and inverse
links therefore have tangents equal to their signed edge sums.
Searchable transcription
For a finite collection of edges these links depend analytically on the finite jet J near zero. One
can see this without differentiating an infinite configuration map. The integral equation in matrix
path space is u = 1 + VJu, where VJ is integration followed by multiplication by the connection.
Near J = 0 its norm is less than one, so (1 −VJ)−1 = P
n≥0 Vn
J is analytic. Uniqueness identifies it
R 1
0 AJ
with (PF5). Differentiating at zero gives the edge tangent
i (x + tei) dt. Products and inverse
links therefore have tangents equal to their signed edge sums.

A sampling slot consists of an oriented elementary plaquette based at an integer point and a finite path from the origin to that point. Evaluate its curvature and transport the color back along that path. A gauge transformation changes every slot by the same adjoint transformation at the

origin. At the identity configuration, the connector derivatives cancel: differentiating ZPZ−1, with Z = P = 1, leaves just P ′. Consequently the linearization of the slot is the circulation of the integrated polynomial potential around the plaquette.

These linear samples separate the truncated radial jets. For one homogeneous component A ∈Vk, define

Nij(x, t) =
Z 1
Z 1
0
∂iAj(x + tsej + trei) dr ds −
Z 1
Z 1
0
∂jAi(x + tsei + trej) dr ds.
(PF6)
0
0
Source page 256.
Searchable transcription
Nij(x, t) =
Z 1
Z 1
0
∂iAj(x + tsej + trei) dr ds −
Z 1
Z 1
0
∂jAi(x + tsei + trej) dr ds.
(PF6)
0
0

At t = 1 the fundamental theorem of calculus identifies this with the square circulation. At t = 0 it is ∂iAj −∂jAi. Homogeneity gives Nij(tx, t) = tkNij(x, 1). If all integer square samples of a sum of components through k vanish, multiply the rescaled component of degree lby tk−l. Choose integer xt with txt →x. The resulting finite sum is zero for t > 0; continuity at zero leaves only N(k) ij (x, 0). Thus the top curl vanishes. Radial reconstruction (RJ4) makes the top potential zero. Descending induction eliminates all components. No interchange of the two iterated integrals in (PF6) is required.

Only finitely many slots are needed. Among kernels of finite sampling families choose one of
minimal dimension. Appending any further slot cannot lower that dimension, hence cannot lower
the kernel. A vector in this kernel is therefore killed by every slot and, by the preceding argument,
is zero. Write X = Q
j<d−1Vj, Y = gm, and T : X →Y for the resulting injective linearization.
Searchable transcription
Only finitely many slots are needed. Among kernels of finite sampling families choose one of
minimal dimension. Appending any further slot cannot lower that dimension, hence cannot lower
the kernel. A vector in this kernel is therefore killed by every slot and, by the preceding argument,
is zero. Write X = Q
j<d−1Vj, Y = gm, and T : X →Y for the resulting injective linearization.

There is an adjoint-equivariant left inverse C : Y →X. Equip Y with the sum of the invariant color inner products. The range of T is invariant under the adjoint action in both directions, so its orthogonal projection commutes with that action. Compose this projection with T −1 on its range. This proves the equivariance of C without needing an invariant inner product on X. Let B : X →Y denote the nonlinear slot readings of the links (PF5) at h = 1. Then B(0) = 0, DB(0) = T, and D(CB)(0) = 1. The finite-dimensional analytic inverse function theorem supplies a local inverse g−1 of g = CB. Define

R(y) = g−1(Cy).
(PF7)
Source page 256.
Searchable transcription
R(y) = g−1(Cy).
(PF7)

It is analytic near zero, R(0) = 0, and R(B(x)) = x near zero. For each fixed gauge transformation its equivariance follows by applying g to both candidate expressions, using equivariance of B, C, and using injectivity on a sufficiently small common neighborhood. The neighborhood is allowed to depend on that transformation. Replace this shared recovery map by its Taylor polynomial

d
X
1
q!DqR(0)[y, . . . , y],
Pi(y) = bi(R≤d(y)).
(PF8)
R≤d(y) =
q=0
Source page 256.
Searchable transcription
d
X
1
q!DqR(0)[y, . . . , y],
Pi(y) = bi(R≤d(y)).
(PF8)
R≤d(y) =
q=0

All derivatives through order d of the first expression equal those of R; differentiating each homogeneous term proves this directly, including its factorial. Expanding multilinear forms in real panel coordinates makes Pi an actual complex polynomial. Its evaluation on real panels is real, and it is adjoint invariant. Because R≤d(0) = 0, each substituted coordinate has no constant term. Every monomial of bi has exactly fi factors. Hence every monomial of Pi has at least fi slot factors. The substitution is not truncated again: terms of degree greater than d are retained.

The geometric scaling identity for (PF5) is

U(J, h) = U(trunkd(hj+2Jj), 1).
(PF9)
Source page 256.
Searchable transcription
U(J, h) = U(trunkd(hj+2Jj), 1).
(PF9)
It follows from homogeneity in (PF4) and uniqueness of the edge equation. Along this curve the slot
panel is B(trunkd(hj+2Jj)). Equations (PF7)–(PF8), and the chain rule through order d, therefore
give
dq
dhq Pi(slots of U(J, h))

h=0
= dq
dhq bi((hj+2Jj)j)

h=0
,
0 ≤q ≤d.
(PF10)
Source page 257.
Searchable transcription
It follows from homogeneity in (PF4) and uniqueness of the edge equation. Along this curve the slot
panel is B(trunkd(hj+2Jj)). Equations (PF7)–(PF8), and the chain rule through order d, therefore
give
dq
dhq Pi(slots of U(J, h))

h=0
= dq
dhq bi((hj+2Jj)j)

h=0
,
0 ≤q ≤d.
(PF10)

This is equality of finite Taylor readings, not equality at nonzero mesh.

To impose the signed lattice symmetries, extend Pi linearly in the coefficient vector, precompose configurations by each signed coordinate permutation, apply the inverse tensor action to the coefficient input, and average over this finite group. Equation (PF10) is preserved: the holonomy of the transformed connection is the transformed holonomy, including reversal and inversion of negatively oriented edges, by (PF5) and uniqueness. The tensor action preserves field number. A transformed slot is a signed slot; combining all these finite slot families into one list and substituting signed variables therefore preserves the lower bound fi on monomial degree. The averaged section fixes the unit and obeys the exact signed symmetry and reality laws.

All paths and squares used are finite. Enclose them and their signed images in one origincontaining symmetric integer box. Each transported curvature slot is a polynomial in matrix entries of its links and their conjugates: inverse unitary links use conjugate transpose, and curvature uses its fixed linear projection of the skew part. Thus the section is a finite polynomial cylinder, gauge invariant, continuous everywhere and smooth along link variations. On a torus it is placed by translating and reducing this finite stencil. Formula (PF10) is used when the stencil does not wrap; the cylinder itself is defined even when it wraps.

Finally fix a derivative order and the direction power of (AB4). On this fixed stencil each transported curvature slot, including its normalized ordered left derivatives, has an envelope bounded by Cθ on the healthy domain. The zeroth estimate is the healthy plaquette bound and adjoint isometry; differentiated plaquettes and connector products have bounded coefficients on the compact group and each allowed direction contributes θ times a fixed stencil constant. For a differentiated product of at least fi slots the Leibniz rule distributes the derivatives; an undifferentiated slot pays θ, and a differentiated slot pays at least one θ. Further derivatives only improve this power since θ ≤1. Finite sums and a maximum over the finite basis give a constant A, independent of torus size, placement and the remaining budget parameters, such that the section of bi has normalized envelope Aθfi. (PF11)

This is the local section estimate used in training and reset budgets. It includes nonlinear terms of (PF8); it is not an estimate only of the linearized sampler.

The actual finest-lattice insertion includes two coefficient changes in a specified order. Let θN > 0 be the healthy-field threshold at level N, let Sd(c; o, U) be the section just constructed, and let Td,N,p be the terminal coefficient isomorphism of the selected history. Put

Id,N,p(v; o, U) = a−d
N Sd
�θ−fi
N (T −1
d,N,pv)i

i; o, U

.
(PF12)
Source page 257.
Searchable transcription
Id,N,p(v; o, U) = a−d
N Sd
θ−fi
N (T −1
d,N,pv)i

i; o, U

.
(PF12)

Thus calibration is applied first, threshold scaling second, and engineering normalization last. The exponent in the threshold scaling is the field number fi, not the engineering degree ri. A general horizon label contains several bidegrees, so neither diagonal scaling may be replaced by one scalar on that entire space.

Although the coefficient vector in (PF12) depends on N, p, its stencil is the single stencil of Sd. Linear combination and multiplication by constants do not enlarge it. Consequently (PF12) is continuous, gauge invariant and supported on that translated stencil for every cutoff, including

cutoffs at which it wraps around the torus. The finite-Taylor normalization and the calibrated symmetry statements are used only after the reference level fits below N; this distinction is needed when constructing a family defined at every cutoff.

At such a cutoffthe terminal map commutes with conjugation and signed orthogonal actions. Its inverse does too, by applying the terminal map to the two candidate values. Threshold scaling commutes with those actions because they preserve field number. Together with the corresponding identities for Sd, these facts prove the reality and signed covariance of (PF12). If e0 denotes the coefficient vector of the constant polynomial, the physical unit at level m is ad me0. The based-history identity is Td,N,p(ad Ne0) = ad kde0. (PF13)

Substituting its inverse in (PF12), using f0 = 0 and Sd(e0) = 1, proves that the reference physical unit gives the constant cylinder one. Translating the placement translates precisely the same coefficient vector; no new history or new calibration is chosen at the new site.

Source–readout formulation. The chain is

J
realize (PF5)
−−−−−−−−−→U(J, h)
slots
−−−−→B
R
−−→J,
Source page 258.
Searchable transcription
J
realize (PF5)
−−−−−−−−−→U(J, h)
slots
−−−−→B
R
−−→J,

with R ◦B = id near zero (PF7): on the image of the realization the slot panel recovers the jet exactly, as analytic germs. The polynomial section replaces R by R≤d and thereby recovers the label reading only through Taylor order d in the mesh (PF10); the loss is everything of higher order, and it is intended (those terms have engineering weight above the horizon). The realization map J 7→U(J, h) is not onto configurations and is not gauge invariant; the readout B is adjoint covariant at the origin and the labels are adjoint-invariant polynomials, so Pi ◦B is gauge invariant. In the frame realization of Theorem 7.1, Sd(c; o, π(r, A)) = Sd(c; o, A) (Proposition 9.1 and gauge invariance), the envelope (PF11) is a fibre constant (Proposition 9.3) and the insertion (PF12) lifts as IZ = I ◦π with the same stencil. The three coefficient operations of (PF12) are recorded separately in the realized tuple, in their order.

Lemma 16.2 (Finitely many slots separate truncated radial jets). There is a finite slot family
whose linearization T : X = Q
j<d−1 Vj →Y = gm is injective, and an adjoint-equivariant left
inverse C : Y →X.
Source page 258.
Searchable transcription
Lemma 16.2 (Finitely many slots separate truncated radial jets). There is a finite slot family
whose linearization T : X = Q
j<d−1 Vj →Y = gm is injective, and an adjoint-equivariant left
inverse C : Y →X.
Proof. If all integer square samples of a sum of components through degree k vanish, multiply the
rescaled component of degree lby tk−land choose integer xt with txt →x; the finite sum is zero
for t > 0, and continuity at t = 0 leaves only N(k)
ij (x, 0). The top curl vanishes, so by Theorem 16.1
the top potential vanishes, and descending induction removes all components. Among kernels of
finite sampling families choose one of minimal dimension; appending any slot cannot lower it, so
a vector in it is killed by every slot and is zero. For C, equip Y with the sum of invariant color
inner products; the range of T is invariant, its orthogonal projection commutes with the adjoint
action, and C is that projection followed by T −1 on the range. No invariant inner product on X is
needed.
Source page 258.
Searchable transcription
Proof. If all integer square samples of a sum of components through degree k vanish, multiply the
rescaled component of degree lby tk−land choose integer xt with txt →x; the finite sum is zero
for t > 0, and continuity at t = 0 leaves only N(k)
ij (x, 0). The top curl vanishes, so by Theorem 16.1
the top potential vanishes, and descending induction removes all components. Among kernels of
finite sampling families choose one of minimal dimension; appending any slot cannot lower it, so
a vector in it is killed by every slot and is zero. For C, equip Y with the sum of invariant color
inner products; the range of T is invariant, its orthogonal projection commutes with the adjoint
action, and C is that projection followed by T −1 on the range. No invariant inner product on X is
needed.

The lemma is the finite-dimensional separation statement on which the chain rests: finitely many lattice slots already determine a truncated radial jet, and the left inverse can be chosen compatibly with the adjoint action, so that the gauge covariance of the readout is not broken by the choice of slots. The exactness class of the label reading is controlled approximation in the mesh (exact through Taylor order d), built on an exact local section.

16.3 Calibrated coefficient changes and exact solutions

The inverse of the local slot sampler in (PF8) is an inverse on truncated radial jets. The coefficient
inverse required for a physical insertion is a different map. We construct it in the norms and units
in which it is used. Fix a degree horizon d, its coherent frame, and a reporting level k ≥kd, where
kd is the reference level for that frame. All assertions in this paragraph are uniform in N ≥k and
the period p, with k fixed.
Let Td,N,p be the calibrated terminal coefficient isomorphism of the insertion history. If v is
its reference coefficient, transport T −1
d,N,pv along that same history to level k and take its primary
coefficient. Denote the result by
Source page 259.
Searchable transcription
The inverse of the local slot sampler in (PF8) is an inverse on truncated radial jets. The coefficient
inverse required for a physical insertion is a different map. We construct it in the norms and units
in which it is used. Fix a degree horizon d, its coherent frame, and a reporting level k ≥kd, where
kd is the reference level for that frame. All assertions in this paragraph are uniform in N ≥k and
the period p, with k fixed.
Let Td,N,p be the calibrated terminal coefficient isomorphism of the insertion history. If v is
its reference coefficient, transport T −1
d,N,pv along that same history to level k and take its primary
coefficient. Denote the result by
Cd,k,N,pv,
Ad,k,N,pv = a−d
k Cd,k,N,pv.
(PC1)
Source page 259.
Searchable transcription
Cd,k,N,pv,
Ad,k,N,pv = a−d
k Cd,k,N,pv.
(PC1)

At the reference level Cd,kd,N,pv = v, by the normalization of the history. At an adjacent step its coefficient estimates give, in the frame norm | · |1,

|Civ|1 ≤Ri+1Ld
i |Ci+1v|1,
|Ci+1v|1 ≤Ri+1|Civ|1,
(PC2)
Source page 259.
Searchable transcription
|Civ|1 ≤Ri+1Ld
i |Ci+1v|1,
|Ci+1v|1 ≤Ri+1|Civ|1,
(PC2)
where Ri+1 ≥1 is the actual column allowance and Li ≥1 the block side. These are bounds on the
primary coefficients of the original transported entries. They do not replace the primary coefficient
by its class in the physical quotient.
Define the finite number
Od,k =
Y
i<k
Ri+1Ld
i ≥1.
(PC3)
Source page 259.
Searchable transcription
where Ri+1 ≥1 is the actual column allowance and Li ≥1 the block side. These are bounds on the
primary coefficients of the original transported entries. They do not replace the primary coefficient
by its class in the physical quotient.
Define the finite number
Od,k =
Y
i<k
Ri+1Ld
i ≥1.
(PC3)

Iterating the first inequality of (PC2), starting at the reference level, and enlarging the product by its factors before that level, proves

|v|1 ≤Od,k|Cd,k,N,pv|1 = Od,kad
k|Ad,k,N,pv|1.
(PC4)
Source page 259.
Searchable transcription
|v|1 ≤Od,k|Cd,k,N,pv|1 = Od,kad
k|Ad,k,N,pv|1.
(PC4)

Iterating the second inequality gives a finite upper bound as well. Thus C and A are injective and hence bijective on the finite coefficient space, with both bounds uniform in the remaining cutoff and period at this fixed level. No bound on Od,k as k →∞is asserted.

The readout map is constructed by polynomial substitution followed by Gaussian contraction. Start with the linear map sending a reference coefficient v to the local polynomial representative of its transported insertion. Rename its finitely many slot variables as the actual link-coordinate variables, multiply each by the threshold factor, and embed them in the one common stencil. Let M(v) denote the resulting polynomial. For its actual symmetric covariance Q, Gaussian contraction means the finite linear operator



X
1
.
(PC5)
WQ = exp
α,β
Qαβ∂α∂β
2
Source page 259.
Searchable transcription


X
1
.
(PC5)
WQ = exp
α,β
Qαβ∂α∂β
2

The exponential terminates on each polynomial. Apply WQ, substitute the linearized slot expressions in the radial-jet variables, and retain monomials of engineering weight at most d. The resulting polynomial is invariant and real when v is real: substitution intertwines the color action, the covariance is invariant, and real coefficients and real covariance commute with coefficient conjugation. It therefore has a unique coefficient vector in the coherent frame.

There is a last field-number rescaling in this definition. Put

ξk,N,p =
β−1/2
N,p,k
θk
> 0,
(Dξz)i = ξfizi,
(PC6)
Source page 259.
Searchable transcription
ξk,N,p =
β−1/2
N,p,k
θk
> 0,
(Dξz)i = ξfizi,
(PC6)

Source: Shadow Theory and the Wilson Yang–Mills Construction: A Source–Readout Reconstruction. Both papers belong to one Zenodo record. No external funding.