Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Source–Readout Non-Equivalence: Descent and Equivariant Reconstruction Obstructions

Abstract

Jeremy RodgersSection 1 of 15Original PDF ↗Publication DOI ↗

Abstract

Let Ω\Omega be a space of admissible realization states, let ≃phys\simeq_{\mathrm{phys}} identify descriptions differing only by declared gauge or coordinate redundancy, and let Π ⁣:Ω→T\Pi\colon\Omega\to T be a readout map invariant under ≃phys\simeq_{\mathrm{phys}}. After passing to the reduced source space S=Ω/ ⁣≃physS=\Omega/\!\simeq_{\mathrm{phys}}, the readout induces a surjection p ⁣:S→Tp\colon S\to T. We show that pp always presents TT exactly as the quotient S/ ⁣∼pS/\!\sim_{p} of SS by equality of readouts, and that this exactness is fully compatible with the failure of pp to be equivalent to SS.

Two distinct obstructions are established. First, a physically invariant source relation r ⁣:S→Vr\colon S\to V descends through the readout if and only if it is constant on every fiber of pp; a relation that varies within a fiber is therefore not a function of readout data. Second, if a group GG acts on SS and TT with pp equivariant, a GG-equivariant section of pp exists if and only if every readout stabilizer GtG_{t} fixes a point of its fiber FtF_{t}; a fiber with no stabilizer-fixed point admits no symmetry-compatible deterministic representative. A finite marked-carrier occupation model and the Hopf fibration h ⁣:S3→S2h\colon S^{3}\to S^{2} realize these obstructions in the discrete and continuous settings respectively, and the Hopf example additionally separates the equivariant obstruction from the independent topological obstruction furnished by a nonvanishing first Chern class.

The results separate three statements that are frequently conflated: exactness of a quotient presentation, existence of a selected representative, and equivalence with the realization source. The first may hold while the second and third fail.

Back to top ↑