Skip to content
Shadow Theory

An Exact Bistability Threshold on Three Nodes

A transverse convexity argument counts the complete stationary set and exposes a misleading sector-stable candidate.

5. Three-node path: exact count and threshold

5.1 Modes and scalar stationary law

For b1=(1,−1,0)Tb_1=(1,-1,0)^T, b2=(0,1,−1)Tb_2=(0,1,-1)^T the orthonormal eigenbasis is

v0=(1,1,1)T3,v1=(1,0,−1)T2,v3=(1,−2,1)T6,Lvλ=λvλ.(26)v_0=\frac{(1,1,1)^T}{\sqrt3},\quad v_1=\frac{(1,0,-1)^T}{\sqrt2},\quad v_3=\frac{(1,-2,1)^T}{\sqrt6},\qquad Lv_\lambda=\lambda v_\lambda.\tag{26}

For f=avλf=av_\lambda, a>0a>0 and λ∈{1,3}\lambda\in\{1,3\}, equal-memory stationary states have z=uvλz=uv_\lambda, m1=m2=−sm_1=m_2=-s, and ∣beTz∣2=λ∣u∣2/2|b_e^Tz|^2=\lambda|u|^2/2. Thus

R2=∣u∣2=4κλses,u=a/cμ+λe−s.(27)R^2=|u|^2=\frac{4\kappa}{\lambda}se^s,\qquad u=\frac{a/c}{\mu+\lambda e^{-s}}.\tag{27} a2∣c∣2=Hλ(s):=4κλses(μ+λe−s)2.(28)\frac{a^2}{|c|^2}=H_\lambda(s):=\frac{4\kappa}{\lambda}se^s(\mu+\lambda e^{-s})^2.\tag{28}

The input fixes phase through a/ca/c. Signed reflection yields the low-mode sector, ordinary reflection the highest-mode sector, with zero collective stationary amplitude. Differentiation gives

Hλ′(s)=4κλ(μ+λe−s)es(1+s)[μ−λQ(s)].(29)H_\lambda'(s)=\frac{4\kappa}{\lambda}(\mu+\lambda e^{-s})e^s(1+s)[\mu-\lambda Q(s)].\tag{29}

If μ≥λχ\mu\ge\lambda\chi, the law increases strictly from zero to infinity; equality permits one isolated flat point. If 0<μ<λχ0<\mu<\lambda\chi, the two roots of Q(s)=μ/λQ(s)=\mu/\lambda obey

1<s−<3<s+.(30)1<s_-<\sqrt3<s_+.\tag{30}

The first gives a strict local maximum, the second a strict local minimum. Set

adown=∣c∣Hλ(s+),aup=∣c∣Hλ(s−).(31)a_{\rm down}=|c|\sqrt{H_\lambda(s_+)},\qquad a_{\rm up}=|c|\sqrt{H_\lambda(s_-)}.\tag{31}

The three monotonicity intervals give three distinct positive roots in the open interval, two distinct roots including a double root at either endpoint, and one outside the closed interval. At an equal-edge equilibrium, rotate the common phase to make amplitude real. The radial and tangential Schur operators are μI−Q(s)L\mu I-Q(s)L and μI+e−sL\mu I+e^{-s}L:

μ,μ−Q,μ−3Q;μ,μ+w,μ+3w,w=e−s.(32)\mu,\quad\mu-Q,\quad\mu-3Q;\qquad \mu,\quad\mu+w,\quad\mu+3w,\qquad w=e^{-s}.\tag{32}

The two collective quadratures decay, since the mean zˉ=(z1+z2+z3)/3\bar z=(z_1+z_2+z_3)/3 obeys

zˉ˙=−cμzˉ+fˉ.(33)\dot{\bar z}=-c\mu\bar z+\bar f.\tag{33}

5.2 Sector stability can miss a full instability

At a low-mode fold Q=μQ=\mu, the transverse highest-mode radial curvature is −2μ<0-2\mu<0. A retained exact example takes μ=0.01\mu=0.01, κ=1\kappa=1, s=5s=5, a=∣c∣H1(5)a=|c|\sqrt{H_1(5)}. Here Q(5)=23e−5Q(5)=\tfrac23e^{-5} and rational exponential bounds give 1/300<Q(5)<1/1001/300<Q(5)<1/100. The sector radial curvature is approximately 0.005508040.00550804, while the transverse curvature is −0.00347589-0.00347589. The full Jacobian has one unstable eigenvalue despite a positive clamped carrier. This rejects the candidate, without ruling out all low-mode bistability: two sufficiently far outer low-mode states can have positive full curvature.

5.3 Complete count for highest-mode preparation

Theorem 5.1 (Complete path bistability). For χ<μ<3χ\chi<\mu<3\chi and f=av3f=av_3, a>0a>0, (27)–(28) with λ=3\lambda=3 give all equilibria. The open fold interval contains two locally exponentially stable minima and one index-one saddle. Outside the closed interval there is one globally asymptotically stable equilibrium. Each colliding pair at an endpoint has one zero and seven decaying linear modes. Every constant-input trajectory converges to a stationary point in these finite regimes.

Proof. Write z=tv0+uv3+hv1z=tv_0+uv_3+hv_1 with complex t,u,ht,u,h. Edges and forcing do not see tt; the collective quadratic forces t=0t=0 at stationarity. Reflection of nodes 1 and 3 fixes v3v_3, reverses v1v_1, and interchanges edges up to irrelevant signs. At fixed uu the potential is even in hh, and the v1v_1 eigenvalue of LL gives

∇h2Veff≥(μ−χ)I2>0.(34)\nabla_h^2V_{\rm eff}\ge(\mu-\chi)I_2>0.\tag{34}

Thus h=0h=0 is its unique critical point. Both edge magnitudes then coincide, so (11) gives m1=m2=−sm_1=m_2=-s. The stationary amplitude equation fixes u=(a/c)/(μ+3e−s)u=(a/c)/(\mu+3e^{-s}), yielding exactly (28). The scalar count is therefore complete. Outer branches have Q<μ/3Q<\mu/3; (32), (21), and Lemma 4.1 give local exponential stability. The middle branch has μ/3<Q≤χ<μ\mu/3<Q\le\chi<\mu, so exactly one Schur direction is negative and the full Jacobian has one right-half-plane eigenvalue. At a fold Q=μ/3Q=\mu/3 and all other Schur directions are positive, giving a simple zero and seven decaying modes. Proposition 2.1 gives convergence in all finite cases. In the one-root case coercivity gives a strict global minimum of VV, hence Lyapunov stability as in Theorem 3.1. This last conclusion is not asserted for the nonhyperbolic colliding point. □\square

Corollary 5.2 (Sharp path threshold and optimal universal coefficient). Every constant complex input on this path has exactly one globally asymptotically stable equilibrium if and only if μ≥3χ\mu\ge3\chi. Consequently χ\chi is the smallest universal sufficient coefficient CC in μ≥C∥L∥\mu\ge C\lVert L\rVert.

Proof. ∥L∥=3\lVert L\rVert=3, so Theorem 3.1 gives sufficiency. For every 0<μ<3χ0<\mu<3\chi, choose highest-mode load strictly between the folds. Both outer scalar roots obey Q<μ/3Q<\mu/3 and are fully stable by (32) and Lemma 4.1. This disproves all-input uniqueness even for μ≤χ\mu\le\chi, where the entire stationary set has not been counted. If C<χC<\chi, choose positive μ<3χ\mu<3\chi with μ≥3C\mu\ge3C to disprove that universal coefficient. □\square

These are distinct statements: a universal sufficient condition, its optimal coefficient over networks, an exact all-input threshold on one path, and uniqueness at one specified drive. At fixed physical aa the three-state condition in the counted range is exactly

H3(s+)<a2γ2+α2<H3(s−).(35)H_3(s_+)<\frac{a^2}{\gamma^2+\alpha^2}<H_3(s_-).\tag{35}

Equivalently, a2/H3(s−)−γ2<α2<a2/H3(s+)−γ2a^2/H_3(s_-)-\gamma^2<\alpha^2<a^2/H_3(s_+)-\gamma^2, restricted to α>0\alpha>0. At a positive endpoint the load derivative −2αa2/(γ2+α2)2-2\alpha a^2/(\gamma^2+\alpha^2)^2 is nonzero, so mobility can pass through a fold at fixed physical drive. This changes the stationary Hessian and does not contradict the fixed-HH result. The stationary equations do not contain η\eta.

Published source: Sharp Uniqueness and Bistability in Driven Adaptive Spectral Carriers. Read the original PDF alongside the web treatment.