Bulk-to-Brane Projection, Dynamical Nonclosure, and Observable Residues in Randall–Sundrum Gravity
Minimal dynamical completion and memory
Minimal dynamical completion and memory
Linear completion: a quotient by the kernel of the brane response
Restrict first to the linearized, fixed-background problem with fixed brane forcing, for which the gauge-reduced bulk perturbation data form a vector space. Let denote the bulk gravitational initial data omitted by the readout (10), and define the brane-response operator with brane initial data and applied brane sources held fixed. Put .
Definition 8.1 (Minimal linear dynamical completion).
This quotient discards exactly the bulk directions that never influence the brane, and retains no more. In the linear spectral representation it retains precisely the coupled KK amplitudes together with the allowed incoming homogeneous modes. Under a prescribed regular no-incoming state, the homogeneous amplitudes are fixed and the entire remaining response is the retarded convolution encoded by .
Schematically, in each relevant projected tensor sector, the exact linear brane equation takes the causal, generally nonlocal form with Tensor indices and normalizations are suppressed throughout (88)–(89): the symbols , , and denote the appropriately normalized operators and sources within the projected tensor sector under consideration. In equation (89), is specifically the scalar coefficient multiplying in the full response operator (63); thus is the spin-two-sector correction relative to the zero-mode operator. The contribution occurs only through the massless combination and must be retained through the full projector-valued response (63). The combination is the complete massless-graviton exchange structure, not a scalar sector. Equation (88) is accordingly a schematic sector-by-sector statement, not a fully explicit tensor identity; the explicit tensor content is (62)–(63). The term is the homogeneous response of the unresolved bulk initial data. Two points deserve emphasis. First, is computed by the KK spectral integral (56); it is not an arbitrary phenomenological memory function. Second, the same spectral density fixes both the branch cut of Section 6.2 and the long-distance residue of Section 6.5 , they are one prediction, not two. This structure agrees with the explicit integro-differential brane perturbation equation of Mukohyama [8].
Nonlinear completion
At the nonlinear level there is generally no vector-space kernel and hence no quotient by a subspace. Instead:
Definition 8.2 (Operational equivalence of bulk data).
Two admissible gauge-reduced bulk data sets are equivalent when, for the same retained brane initial data, they induce the same complete brane record for every allowed brane protocol. The minimal predictive completion is the set of these equivalence classes.
The tensor is the local manifestation of the missing bulk response, not a substitute for it. Its divergence equation (42) constrains it but does not evolve it; supplying instantaneously does not close the system, because its subsequent evolution requires the bulk problem. The nonlinear completion is therefore neither the linear quotient (87) nor, in general, a finite set of four-dimensional functions.