= 0, equal planes containing zero and equal planes avoiding zero are the two possible types. For
= 0, the planes share one other index, and the two placements of the derivative factor are the other types. Permutations fixing zero identify all coefficients of each type; antisymmetry fixes their signs. The three displayed tests kill three types. The cyclic identity leg
+ leg
+ leg
paired with leg
, kills the fourth. The legs span each radial jet space by the expansion
Searchable transcription
2 X 2 X A = 1 i,j legij(curl0(i, j)A), B = 1 i,j,k legk;ij(curl1(k, i, j)B).
Bilinearity therefore kills the entire mixed part. Reality recovers the complex coefficient from its real part. The three evaluations form an injective real map, proving the raw upper bound three. The two solution evaluations in (FC10) and the nonsolution pair (leg leg
), on which
= 1, prove independence of
. Thus (FC11) is a basis and every raw vector has unique coordinates.
For later use, the divergence of the raw centered tensor with coefficients respectively diagonal mountain, diagonal total and off-diagonal shear, has these coordinates:
Searchable transcription
Div(w) = 2(w0 −w2)V1 + (2w1 + 1 2w2)V2 + w2E. (FC14)
Searchable transcription
The product rule gives 2V1 for the first tensor and 2V2 for the second. For the shear use Bianchi and interchange the ordered indices to obtain P a,i Pai;abi = 1 2V2,b; deleting the a = b terms subtracts 2V1,b, while the other product derivative is Eb. This proves (FC14). Its coordinate matrix is invertible, with inverse
Searchable transcription
w2 = y2, w0 = y0/2 + y2, w1 = y1/2 −y2/4.
It defines the actual scalar contraction on raw vectors:
Searchable transcription
ρ(Div(w)) = −4(w0 + 4w1) = −2y0 −8y1. (FC15)
Searchable transcription
If Q = 1 4 P i,j⟨Fij, Fij⟩, the tensor trace is 4(w0 + 4w1)Q; hence ρ reads minus that trace in Q-units. It kills E and the traceless conserved tensor w = (1, −1/4, 1). Since (FC10) proves that the raw equation kernel is exactly RE, ρ annihilates that entire kernel. This is the scalar sensor used later, with its sign and normalization fixed. The identification of the free quotient here uses the Maxwell polynomial evaluation and the reflected Gram norm proved in (FM3)–(FM4) and in the detector’s reflected polynomial calculation; it is not an additional assumption of nondegeneracy.
Source: A Wilson Yang–Mills Construction: A Natural-Language Mathematical Exposition. Both papers belong to one Zenodo record. No external funding.