Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Complete Folds and the Mixed Critical Coordinate

The stationary count, full saddle-node coefficients and a passing-trajectory estimate in the fixed-fold chart.

3. Stationary geometry and complete fold data

At fixed amplitude the memory Hessian and stationary solution are

(Hm)ee=κ+12eme∣beTz∣2>0.(14)(H_m)_{ee}=\kappa+\tfrac12e^{m_e}|b_e^Tz|^2>0.\tag{14} me=−se,seese=∣beTz∣2/(2κ),se=W0(∣beTz∣2/(2κ)).(15)m_e=-s_e,\quad s_ee^{s_e}=|b_e^Tz|^2/(2\kappa),\quad s_e=W_0(|b_e^Tz|^2/(2\kappa)).\tag{15} Veff(z,a)=μ2∥z∥2+∑eκ(se+se2/2)−Re⁡[(av3/c)∗z].(16)V_{\rm eff}(z,a)=\tfrac\mu2\lVert z\rVert^2+ \sum_e\kappa(s_e+s_e^2/2)-\operatorname{Re}[(av_3/c)^*z].\tag{16}

W0W_0 is the principal real Lambert function (Corless et al., 1996). This is an exact stationary correspondence. For w=e−sw=e^{-s} an edge has tangential curvature ww and radial curvature −Q0(s)-Q_0(s):

Q0(s)=e−ss−1s+1,Q0′(s)=e−s3−s2(1+s)2,χ=(2−3)e−3=max⁡s≥0Q0(s).(17)Q_0(s)=e^{-s}\frac{s-1}{s+1},\quad Q_0'(s)=e^{-s}\frac{3-s^2}{(1+s)^2},\quad \chi=(2-\sqrt3)e^{-\sqrt3}=\max_{s\ge0}Q_0(s).\tag{17}

The orthonormal modes are v0=(1,1,1)T/3v_0=(1,1,1)^T/\sqrt3, v1=(1,0,−1)T/2v_1=(1,0,-1)^T/\sqrt2 and v3v_3, with eigenvalues 0,1,30,1,3.

Lemma 3.1 (Complete counted regime). For χ<μ<3χ\chi<\mu<3\chi and a>0a>0, every stationary state has

z=θR(s)v3,m=(−s,−s),θ=∣c∣/c,R(s)=4κ3ses.(18)z=\theta R(s)v_3,\qquad m=(-s,-s),\qquad \theta=|c|/c,\quad R(s)=\sqrt{\tfrac{4\kappa}{3}se^s}.\tag{18} a(s)=∣c∣H3(s),H3(s)=4κ3ses(μ+3e−s)2.(19)a(s)=|c|\sqrt{H_3(s)},\qquad H_3(s)=\tfrac{4\kappa}{3}se^s(\mu+3e^{-s})^2.\tag{19}

The two roots s−∈(1,3)s_-\in(1,\sqrt3) and s+>3s_+>\sqrt3 of Q0(s±)=μ/3Q_0(s_\pm)=\mu/3 give

aup=a(s−),adown=a(s+),adown<aup.(20)a_{\rm up}=a(s_-),\qquad a_{\rm down}=a(s_+),\qquad a_{\rm down}<a_{\rm up}.\tag{20}

There are exactly two stable minima and an index-one saddle in the open interval. At either endpoint there is a simple saddle-node and the other minimum; outside the closed interval there is one stable equilibrium.

Proof. Write z=tv0+uv3+hv1z=tv_0+uv_3+hv_1 in complex coordinates. The collective potential μ∣t∣2/2\mu|t|^2/2 forces t=0t=0. Reflection fixes uu and reverses hh. The even real two-dimensional hh slice has Hessian at least (μ−χ)I>0(\mu-\chi)I>0 since Lv1=v1Lv_1=v_1. Its sole critical point is h=0h=0. Both memory values then coincide; the amplitude equation fixes phase and gives (18)–(19). This excludes hidden complex or symmetry-broken equilibria. The derivative is

H3′(s)=4κ3(μ+3e−s)es(1+s)[μ−3Q0(s)].(21)H_3'(s)=\tfrac{4\kappa}{3}(\mu+3e^{-s})e^s(1+s)[\mu-3Q_0(s)].\tag{21}

The unique maximum of Q0Q_0 gives two simple turning points, maximum at s−s_- and minimum at s+s_+. With H3(0)=0H_3(0)=0 and H3(s)→∞H_3(s)\to\infty the monotonic pieces give all counts. The complete Hessian is

H=(KRBBTHm),KR=diag⁡(K,K),B:e=emediag⁡(Be,Be)q.(22)H=\begin{pmatrix}K_R&B\\ B^T&H_m\end{pmatrix},\qquad K_R=\operatorname{diag}(K,K),\qquad B_{:e}=e^{m_e}\operatorname{diag}(B_e,B_e)q.\tag{22}

Completing the memory square gives the negative and zero counts of S=KR−BHm−1BT=∇2VeffS=K_R-BH_m^{-1}B^T=\nabla^2V_{\rm eff} and two additional positive directions. At an equal-edge state the six Schur eigenvalues are

μ,μ−Q0,μ−3Q0;μ,μ+w,μ+3w.(23)\mu,\quad\mu-Q_0,\quad\mu-3Q_0;\qquad\mu,\quad\mu+w,\quad\mu+3w.\tag{23}

The full mobility bridge applies because HH is symmetric and Sym⁡D>0\operatorname{Sym}D>0. A nonzero imaginary eigenvector would give (Hv)∗D(Hv)=−iωv∗Hv(Hv)^*D(Hv)=-i\omega v^*Hv, impossible by real parts. A generalized zero vector yields 0=−v0∗D−1v00=-v_0^*D^{-1}v_0 for Hv0=0Hv_0=0, impossible because D−1D^{-1} has positive symmetric part. Deforming DD to II therefore preserves half-plane counts and zero multiplicity, including complex algebraic multiplicities. Equation (23) gives all stability classes. At a fold only μ−3Q0\mu-3Q_0 vanishes, leaving seven decaying modes. The nonzero saddle-node coefficients follow next. □\square

At either fold,

X(x,a)=−DY(x,a),Y(x,a)=∇F(x)−ah,h=(Re⁡(v3/c),Im⁡(v3/c),0,0).(24)X(x,a)=-DY(x,a),\quad Y(x,a)=\nabla F(x)-ah,\quad h=(\operatorname{Re}(v_3/c),\operatorname{Im}(v_3/c),0,0).\tag{24}

Let xf=x(sf)x_f=x(s_f), af=a(sf)a_f=a(s_f) and Lf=Xx(xf,af)=−DHL_f=X_x(x_f,a_f)=-DH. Normalize by

r=xs(sf),df=rTD−1r>0,lT=rTD−1/df,lTr=1.(25)r=x_s(s_f),\qquad d_f=r^TD^{-1}r>0,\qquad l^T=r^TD^{-1}/d_f,\qquad l^Tr=1.\tag{25}

The two memory components of rr are (−1,−1)(-1,-1); neither amplitude quadrature nor memory is dropped. Differentiating the stationary identity at a′=0a'=0 gives Hr=0Hr=0 and rTYxx[r,r]=(rTh)a′′r^TY_{xx}[r,r]=(r^Th)a''; rTh=R′/∣c∣>0r^Th=R'/|c|>0. The full coefficients are

Af=lTXa=rThdf>0,Bf=12lTXxx[r,r]=−12Afa′′(sf).(26)A_f=l^TX_a=\frac{r^Th}{d_f}>0,\qquad B_f=\tfrac12l^TX_{xx}[r,r]=-\tfrac12A_f a''(s_f).\tag{26}

From (21) a′′<0a''<0 at s−s_- and a′′>0a''>0 at s+s_+. Thus BfB_f is positive at the upper fold and negative at the lower fold. The simple zero and nonzero coefficients establish full saddle-nodes.

Foldafa_fAfA_fBfB_fKfK_f
up3.1050136210.3983917660.1333957696.218901175
down2.9588967460.355600158-0.0724771067.915472816

Table 1. Complete fold coefficients for (6) with normalization (25). Kf=ζ1/(Af∣Bf∣)1/3K_f=\zeta_1/(A_f|B_f|)^{1/3}. The computed stable gap is 0.06.

4. Fixed-fold reduction with dynamic memory

4.1 Projection and extended nilpotent structure

Fix Pf=rlTP_f=rl^T, Qf=I−PfQ_f=I-P_f. Since Lfr=0L_fr=0 and lTLf=0l^TL_f=0, Es=ker⁡lTE_s=\ker l^T is invariant and its restricted AsA_s is Hurwitz. All coordinates are fixed at the fold:

x−xf=ry+w,y=lT(x−xf),w∈Es,λ=a−af.(27)x-x_f=ry+w,\quad y=l^T(x-x_f),\quad w\in E_s,\quad \lambda=a-a_f.\tag{27}

Input is affine and state independent, so Xxa=0X_{xa}=0. Taylor expansion gives

y˙=Afλ+Bfy2+Ny(y,w),w˙=Asw+QfXaλ+Nw(y,w),Ny=O(∣y∣3+∣y∣∥w∥+∥w∥2),Nw=O(y2+∣y∣∥w∥+∥w∥2).(28)\begin{aligned} \dot y&=A_f\lambda+B_fy^2+N_y(y,w),\quad \dot w=A_sw+Q_fX_a\lambda+N_w(y,w),\\ N_y&=O(|y|^3+|y|\lVert w\rVert+\lVert w\rVert^2),\\ N_w&=O(y^2+|y|\lVert w\rVert+\lVert w\rVert^2). \end{aligned}\tag{28} λ˙=ϵ,ϵ˙=0.(29)\dot\lambda=\epsilon,\qquad \dot\epsilon=0.\tag{29}

The augmented constant-slope system has centre coordinates (y,λ,ϵ)(y,\lambda,\epsilon) with a nilpotent linear chain y˙=Afλ\dot y=A_f\lambda, λ˙=ϵ\dot\lambda=\epsilon, rather than three independent semisimple zero modes. The finite-dimensional centre-manifold theorem applies to the zero-real-part centre spectrum and strictly stable complement (Carr, 1981, 2006). Choose a finite C4C^4 chart and graph

w=ψ(y,λ,ϵ),ψ=O(y2+∣λ∣+∣ϵ∣).(30)w=\psi(y,\lambda,\epsilon),\qquad \psi=O(y^2+|\lambda|+|\epsilon|).\tag{30}

Inserting ψ=Cλλ+Cϵϵ+⋯\psi=C_\lambda\lambda+C_\epsilon\epsilon+\cdots in the invariance equation gives

Cλ=ψλ(0)=−As−1QfXa,Cϵ=ψϵ(0)=As−1Cλ.(31)C_\lambda=\psi_\lambda(0)=-A_s^{-1}Q_fX_a,\qquad C_\epsilon=\psi_\epsilon(0)=A_s^{-1}C_\lambda.\tag{31}

The inverses act on EsE_s; CϵC_\epsilon retains parameter motion. The mixed critical equation becomes

y˙=Afλ+Bfy2+R,∣R∣≤C(∣y∣3+∣yλ∣+λ2+∣ϵ∣).(32)\dot y=A_f\lambda+B_fy^2+R,\qquad |R|\le C(|y|^3+|y\lambda|+\lambda^2+|\epsilon|).\tag{32}

The graph retains dynamical memory rather than replacing it by a stationary Lambert value.

4.2 Attraction during passage

Lemma 4.1 (Finite-chart stable-direction estimate). In a sufficiently small fold chart the deviation e=w−ψ(y,λ,ϵ)e=w-\psi(y,\lambda,\epsilon) decays exponentially for the time the complete trajectory stays in the chart, regardless of critical equilibrium stability.

Proof. Subtract the graph invariance equation at the actual (y,λ,ϵ)(y,\lambda,\epsilon). Parameter derivatives and the Bfy2B_fy^2 term cancel:

e˙=Ase+[Nw(y,ψ+e)−Nw(y,ψ)]−ψy[Ny(y,ψ+e)−Ny(y,ψ)].(33)\dot e=A_se+[N_w(y,\psi+e)-N_w(y,\psi)]-\psi_y[N_y(y,\psi+e)-N_y(y,\psi)].\tag{33}

The nonlinear derivatives in ww vanish at the origin and are O(δ)O(\delta) on a radius-δ\delta chart; ψy(0)=0\psi_y(0)=0. Thus e˙=[As+O(δ)]e+O(∥e∥2)\dot e=[A_s+O(\delta)]e+O(\lVert e\rVert^2). Choose Ps>0P_s>0 on EsE_s with AsTPs+PsAs=−IA_s^TP_s+P_sA_s=-I. For small enough chart,

ddt(eTPse)≤−12∥e∥2.(34)\frac d{dt}(e^TP_se)\le-\tfrac12\lVert e\rVert^2.\tag{34}

Norm equivalence gives ∥e(t)∥≤Ce−g(t−t0)∥e(t0)∥\lVert e(t)\rVert\le Ce^{-g(t-t_0)}\lVert e(t_0)\rVert. Its effect on the critical equation is an integrable decaying perturbation. □\square

After transients, variation of constants gives w=O(ν2/3)w=O(\nu^{2/3}) for y=O(ν1/3)y=O(\nu^{1/3}) and λ=O(ν2/3)\lambda=O(\nu^{2/3}). If using moving stationary coordinates the forcing would include −x∗′(a)a˙-x_*'(a)\dot a, and moving eigenvectors would add a connection term. The fixed chart avoids the singular branch derivative while keeping parameter motion in (31). Regular branch tracking below restores the moving-reference term explicitly.

Published source: Slow Passage and Prepared Hysteresis in Adaptive Spectral Carriers. Read the original PDF alongside the web treatment.