Skip to content

Read null rays and optical bending

Null propagation requires an operation separate from normalized timelike length. Optical variation and regularized endpoint integrals recover bending with the boundary geometry and error bounds stated explicitly.

Null propagation requires an operation separate from normalized timelike length. Optical variation and regularized endpoint integrals recover bending with the boundary geometry and error bounds stated explicitly.

16. Null rays, optical variation and bending

The calibrated null constraint is

η(Edx,Edx)=0⟺gμνdxμdxν=0,(16.1)\eta(E\mathrm{d}x,E\mathrm{d}x)=0\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad g_{\mu\nu}\mathrm{d}x^\mu\mathrm{d}x^\nu=0, \tag{16.1}

recovering Einstein (73). It specifies local allowed directions, not a complete ray path. Einstein adds Huygens reasoning. We retain the direction-dependent static optical operation so that variation is performed before a propagation direction is fixed.

For ds2=N2dt2−sijdxidxj\mathrm{d}s^2=N^2\mathrm{d}t^2-s_{ij}\mathrm{d}x^i\mathrm{d}x^j, N>0N>0, the elapsed coordinate time along a future null path is

T[γ]=∫sijx′ix′jNdλ.(16.2)\mathcal T[\gamma]=\int\frac{\sqrt{s_{ij}x'^ix'^j}}{N}\mathrm{d}\lambda. \tag{16.2}

Its fixed-spatial-endpoint stationary paths agree with spatial projections of null geodesics. To see the equivalence, keep the conserved ktk_t in the static null Hamiltonian. The constraint is sijkikj=kt2/N2s^{ij}k_ik_j=k_t^2/N^2; the reduced fixed-energy line functional is ∣kt∣T|k_t|\mathcal T. Variation gives the optical metric sij/N2s_{ij}/N^2, and choosing affine scale with dt/dλ=kt/N2\mathrm{d}t/\mathrm{d}\lambda=k_t/N^2 restores the spacetime geodesic. This is a classical geometrical-optics/test-ray operation, not a finite-wavelength Maxwell error estimate.

The original asymptotic integral and its finite-endpoint qualification

Take the first-order central metric and the straight reference ray x=b>0x=b>0, z=0z=0, with yy increasing along the ray; set r=b2+y2r=\sqrt{b^2+y^2}. Its coordinate speed in that direction is

γ=1−α/r1+αy2/r3=1−α2r(1+y2r2)+O(α2).(16.3)\gamma=\sqrt{\frac{1-\alpha/r}{1+\alpha y^2/r^3}} =1-\frac\alpha{2r}\left(1+\frac{y^2}{r^2}\right)+O(\alpha^2). \tag{16.3}

The supplied scan prints a positive correction on p. 822. Insertion into the preceding null equation gives a nonzero first-order residual. The negative sign is fixed by (16.1), not selected to fit a desired bending angle.

The inward-positive integrand of the displayed original asymptotic calculation is

I(y)=∂bγ(1)=αb2r3(1+3y2r2),BI(y)=α2b(yr+y3r3).(16.4)I(y)=\partial_b\gamma^{(1)} =\frac{\alpha b}{2r^3}\left(1+\frac{3y^2}{r^2}\right),\qquad \mathcal B_I(y)=\frac\alpha{2b}\left(\frac yr+\frac{y^3}{r^3}\right). \tag{16.4}

Differentiation verifies the primitive. Its infinite endpoint values give

B=∫−∞∞I(y)dy=2αb=κM2πb=4KMc2b.(16.5)\boxed{B=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}I(y)\mathrm{d}y =\frac{2\alpha}{b}=\frac{\kappa M}{2\pi b}=\frac{4KM}{c^2b}.} \tag{16.5}

The parameter form is Einstein (74). The mass expression printed there propagates the inconsistent factor from Einstein (70a); the same-mass join is (14.2).

Theorem 16.1 (Boundary-sensitive optical recovery)

Let p=dx/dyp=\mathrm{d}x/\mathrm{d}y and retain the full first-order optical integrand

L(x,y,p)=1+p2+α1+p22r+α(xp+y)22r31+p2+O(α2),r=x2+y2.(16.6)L(x,y,p)=\sqrt{1+p^2} +\frac{\alpha\sqrt{1+p^2}}{2r} +\frac{\alpha(xp+y)^2}{2r^3\sqrt{1+p^2}}+O(\alpha^2), \quad r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}. \tag{16.6}

On the straight reference path its first-order ray equation is

x′′=−3αb32r5,−x′′=I(y)+ddyPend(y),Pend=αbyr3.(16.7)x''=-\frac{3\alpha b^3}{2r^5},\qquad -x''=I(y)+\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}y}P_{\rm end}(y),\qquad P_{\rm end}=\frac{\alpha b y}{r^3}. \tag{16.7}

Thus the inward coordinate-direction change on a finite segment is

B[y1,y2]=∫y1y2I(y)dy+[Pend(y)]y1y2(16.8)B_{[y_1,y_2]}=\int_{y_1}^{y_2}I(y)\mathrm{d}y +[P_{\rm end}(y)]_{y_1}^{y_2} \tag{16.8}

at the retained order. The endpoint term vanishes at asymptotic endpoints.

Proof.

At p=0p=0 the zeroth-order integrand has Lpp=1L_{pp}=1. The linearized Euler–Lagrange equation is x′′=∂xL(1)−d(∂pL(1))/dyx''=\partial_xL^{(1)}-\mathrm{d}(\partial_pL^{(1)})/\mathrm{d}y, evaluated at x=b,p=0x=b,p=0. There L(1)=−γ(1)L^{(1)}=-\gamma^{(1)} and ∂pL(1)=Pend\partial_pL^{(1)}=P_{\rm end}. Differentiation gives (16.7). Independently inserting the first-order metric and v=(0,1,0)v=(0,1,0) in (13.2) gives the same transverse acceleration. The actual curvature primitive is Bray=α(3y/r−y3/r3)/(2b)\mathcal B_{\rm ray}=\alpha(3y/r-y^3/r^3)/(2b), and Bray−BI=Pend\mathcal B_{\rm ray}-\mathcal B_I=P_{\rm end}, proving the endpoint relation directly.

□\square

The finite quantity in (16.8) is explicitly a coordinate-direction change in the stated chart. A finite observer-measured angle also requires local observer frames at the endpoints; that additional identification is not asserted. At infinity the stated asymptotic normalization makes the comparison used by the original calculation. The two integrands are not pointwise identical. Deleting the spatial metric perturbation while retaining g44g_{44} instead gives α/b\alpha/b, half the full result, illustrating the information missing from the Newtonian force readout alone.

A controlled infinite-path comparison

Pointwise truncation by itself does not justify an integral over an infinite path. The derived exact radial family provides a controlled comparison. Let rmr_m be closest areal approach and d=α/rmd=\alpha/r_m. Null energy and angular momentum give the asymptotic impact parameter

b=rm1−d.(16.9)b=\frac{r_m}{\sqrt{1-d}}. \tag{16.9}

With u=rm/ru=r_m/r, the half-angle denominator factors as

(1−d)−u2+du3=(1−u2)[1−d(u+11+u)].(16.10)(1-d)-u^2+du^3=(1-u^2)\left[1-d\left(u+\frac1{1+u}\right)\right]. \tag{16.10}

The substitution u=sin⁡θu=\sin\theta removes the turning-point singularity and gives

Bexact=2∫0π/2[1−dQ(θ)]−1/2dθ−π,Q(θ)=sin⁡θ+11+sin⁡θ.(16.11)B_{\rm exact}=2\int_0^{\pi/2}[1-dQ(\theta)]^{-1/2}\mathrm{d}\theta-\pi, \qquad Q(\theta)=\sin\theta+\frac1{1+\sin\theta}. \tag{16.11}

For 0<d<2/30<d<2/3 this is the outer turning branch. On the interval, 1≤Q≤3/21\le Q\le3/2 and ∫Qdθ=2\int Q\mathrm{d}\theta=2. Taylor’s theorem for (1−x)−1/2(1-x)^{-1/2} has nonnegative remainder bounded by 3x2/[8(1−q)5/2]3x^2/[8(1-q)^{5/2}] on 0≤x≤q<10\le x\le q<1. Since ∫Q2dθ≤9π/8\int Q^2\mathrm{d}\theta\le9\pi/8,

0≤Bexact−2αb≤27πd232(1−3d/2)5/2+2d21+1−d.(16.12)\boxed{0\le B_{\rm exact}-\frac{2\alpha}{b} \le\frac{27\pi d^2}{32(1-3d/2)^{5/2}} +\frac{2d^2}{1+\sqrt{1-d}}.} \tag{16.12}

The first term bounds Bexact−2dB_{\rm exact}-2d; the second is exactly 2d−2d1−d2d-2d\sqrt{1-d}. This is a sufficient bound within the static spherical family, not an uncertainty estimate for a star with unspecified multipoles or surroundings.

Published source: The Foundations of General Relativity: A Source–Readout Reconstruction of Einstein’s 1916 Theory. Read the original PDF alongside the web treatment.