Skip to content

Recover the fluid equations

A constitutive stress readout turns matter primitives into the coupled stress. Its conservation law yields the fluid equations only with the normalization and constitutive inputs that make those operations valid.

A constitutive stress readout turns matter primitives into the coupled stress. Its conservation law yields the fluid equations only with the normalization and constitutive inputs that make those operations valid.

11. Fluid constitutive readouts and Euler equations

Part D supplies constitutive information that a generic stress tensor cannot recover by itself. In §19 Einstein introduces pressure pp, a density variable ρ\rho, a relation between them and a normalized four-velocity. His footnote defines the comoving energy density as ϵ=ρ−p\epsilon=\rho-p. Thus his ρ\rho is not the variable often called energy density in modern notation. We preserve this convention.

On the existing realization add smooth p,ρp,\rho and a calibrated vector vv, initially retaining the discrepancies n−1=η(v,v)−1n-1=\eta(v,v)-1 and Φ(p,ρ)\Phi(p,\rho) for the supplied equation-of-state relation. Define

Σabfl=−pηab+ρvavb,va=ηabvb,u=E−1v.(11.1)\Sigma^{\rm fl}_{ab}=-p\eta_{ab}+\rho v_av_b,\qquad v_a=\eta_{ab}v^b,\qquad u=E^{-1}v. \tag{11.1}

The physical constitutive form is inherited. Its forward operation gives

Tμνfl=−pgμν+ρuμuν,Tflμν=−pqμν+ρuμuν,(11.2)Tμν,fl=−pδνμ+ρuμuν,g(u,u)=η(v,v).(11.3)\begin{aligned} T^{\rm fl}_{\mu\nu}&=-pg_{\mu\nu}+\rho u_\mu u_\nu,\qquad T^{\mu\nu}_{\rm fl}=-pq^{\mu\nu}+\rho u^\mu u^\nu,&&\text{(11.2)}\\ T^\mu{}_{\nu,\rm fl}&=-p\delta^\mu_\nu+\rho u^\mu u_\nu, \qquad g(u,u)=\eta(v,v). &&\text{(11.3)}\end{aligned}

Indeed ETvlower=guE^{\mathsf T}v_{\rm lower}=gu, and the tensor operations already proved recover the remaining forms. These are Einstein (58), Einstein (58a), Einstein (58b). On n=1n=1,

Σabflvavb=ρ−p=ϵ,tr⁡ηΣfl=ρ−4p,Σcomovingfl=diag⁡(p,p,p,ρ−p).(11.4)\Sigma^{\rm fl}_{ab}v^av^b=\rho-p=\epsilon, \quad \operatorname{tr}_\eta\Sigma^{\rm fl}=\rho-4p, \quad \Sigma^{\rm fl}_{\rm comoving}=\operatorname{diag}(p,p,p,\rho-p). \tag{11.4}

No extra thermodynamic or particle-number law is inferred from that definition.

Define, for a scalar ss,

s˙=vaDas,ϑ=Dava,ab=vaDavb.(11.5)\dot s=v^aD_as,\qquad \vartheta=D_av^a,\qquad a_b=v^aD_av_b. \tag{11.5}

The product rule and Dη=0D\eta=0 give the full raw divergence

Rbfl:=DaΣab,fl=vb(ρ˙+ρϑ)+ρab−Dbp.(11.6)\mathscr R_b^{\rm fl}:=D_a\Sigma^a{}_{b,\rm fl} =v_b(\dot\rho+\rho\vartheta)+\rho a_b-D_bp. \tag{11.6}

Its coordinate readout is

EbμRbfl=∇αTαμ,fl=ν−1∂α(νTαμ,fl)−12∂μgαβTflαβ.(11.7)E^b{}_{\mu}\mathscr R_b^{\rm fl} =\nabla_\alpha T^\alpha{}_{\mu,\rm fl} =\nu^{-1}\partial_\alpha(\nu T^\alpha{}_{\mu,\rm fl}) -\tfrac12\partial_\mu g_{\alpha\beta}T^{\alpha\beta}_{\rm fl}. \tag{11.7}

Substitution into the recovered Einstein (57a) is therefore exactly the source equation Rfl=0\mathscr R^{\rm fl}=0, with the same comparison connection as gravity.

Theorem 11.1 (Reversible energy and Euler decomposition)

On η(v,v)=1\eta(v,v)=1, put

Πbc=δbc−vbvc,E=(ρ−p)˙+ρϑ,Pb=ρab−ΠbcDcp.(11.8)\Pi_b{}^c=\delta_b^c-v_bv^c,\qquad \mathscr E=\dot{(\rho-p)}+\rho\vartheta,\qquad \mathscr P_b=\rho a_b-\Pi_b{}^cD_cp. \tag{11.8}

Then

Rbfl=vbE+Pb,vbRbfl=E,vbPb=0.(11.9)\mathscr R_b^{\rm fl}=v_b\mathscr E+\mathscr P_b, \qquad v^b\mathscr R_b^{\rm fl}=\mathscr E, \qquad v^b\mathscr P_b=0. \tag{11.9}

Consequently the four conservation equations are equivalent to

ϵ˙+(ϵ+p)ϑ=0,ρab=(δbc−vbvc)Dcp.(11.10)\boxed{\dot\epsilon+(\epsilon+p)\vartheta=0,\qquad \rho a_b=(\delta_b^c-v_bv^c)D_cp.} \tag{11.10}

The second equation has three independent components in this normalized sector.

Proof.

Differentiating η(v,v)=1\eta(v,v)=1 gives vbab=0v^ba_b=0. Contract (11.6) with vbv^b to obtain E\mathscr E, then subtract vbEv_b\mathscr E to obtain P\mathscr P. Conversely the first equality in (11.9) reconstructs the original divergence from the scalar and orthogonal covector. The inverse map is (e,pb)↦vbe+pb(e,p_b)\mapsto v_be+p_b, with vbpb=0v^bp_b=0. No division by ρ\rho is used.

□\square

The coordinate Euler equation is

ρuα∇αuμ=(δμν−uμuν)∂νp.(11.11)\rho u^\alpha\nabla_\alpha u_\mu =(\delta_\mu^\nu-u_\mu u^\nu)\partial_\nu p. \tag{11.11}

This expands Einstein’s substitution, rather than adding a distinct material law.

The algebraic decomposition R=vlowerE+P\mathscr R=v_{\rm lower}\mathscr E+\mathscr P remains true for unnormalized vv under the same definitions, but its projection interpretation does not. The exact omitted terms are

vbRb=E+(n−1)(ρ˙+ρϑ)+ρ2n˙,(11.12)vbPb=ρ2n˙+(n−1)p˙.(11.13)\begin{aligned} v^b\mathscr R_b&=\mathscr E+(n-1)(\dot\rho+\rho\vartheta)+\tfrac\rho2\dot n, &&\text{(11.12)}\\ v^b\mathscr P_b&=\tfrac\rho2\dot n+(n-1)\dot p. &&\text{(11.13)}\end{aligned}

This distinction is included in the public controls. One earlier test wrongly expected the algebraic decomposition itself to fail off normalization; the corrected test checks the actual projection and orthogonality assertions, with that development correction documented in the audit.

Closure, degeneracy and verification examples

The primitive reverse v=Euv=Eu preserves the normalization, equation-of-state relation and target boundary data. The six listed functions p,ρ,uμp,\rho,u^\mu and the four divergence equations recover the original system. Their count is not a general well-posedness proof. On ρ=0\rho=0 and constant pp, the stress is −pη-p\eta and its divergence vanishes for any normalized vv; the velocity is not determined. The gravitational conservation identities also prevent counting the material divergence equations as independent additional metric equations. Einstein’s residual coordinate-function count after volume specialization is retained as bookkeeping, not a global gauge-fixing theorem.

The earlier pressureless coupled fixture (10.22) now has its constitutive data: v=(0,0,0,1)v=(0,0,0,1), p=0p=0, ρ=ϵd\rho=\epsilon_d. For an independent radiation-fluid fixture, take

Er=diag⁡(r1/5,r1/5,r1/5,r−3/5),ϵr=325κr−4/5,p=ϵr3,ρ=4ϵr3.(11.14)E_r=\operatorname{diag}(r^{1/5},r^{1/5},r^{1/5},r^{-3/5}),\quad \epsilon_r=\frac3{25\kappa}r^{-4/5},\quad p=\frac{\epsilon_r}{3},\quad \rho=\frac{4\epsilon_r}{3}. \tag{11.14}

The constitutive operation gives Σ=diag⁡(ϵr/3,ϵr/3,ϵr/3,ϵr)\Sigma=\operatorname{diag}(\epsilon_r/3,\epsilon_r/3,\epsilon_r/3,\epsilon_r), with zero trace. Both projected fluid equations and G=κΣ\mathscr G=\kappa\Sigma hold in the same geometry. Substituting ϵr\epsilon_r for Einstein’s ρ\rho would change both the stress and the equations.

A separate fixed-background test exercises a nonzero pressure gradient and acceleration: with N=1+xN=1+x, E=diag⁡(1,1,1,N)E=\operatorname{diag}(1,1,1,N), v=(0,0,0,1)v=(0,0,0,1), choose p=2/N−1p=2/N-1 and ρ=2/N\rho=2/N on 0<x<10<x<1. Then ϵ=1\epsilon=1, a1=−1/Na_1=-1/N, and ∂1p=−2/N2\partial_1p=-2/N^2, so (11.10) holds. This is a fluid calculation on a prescribed flat accelerated geometry, not a coupled solution with that geometry and nonzero stress. The classification prevents a successful matter example from being joined to a different gravitational preparation.

Published source: The Foundations of General Relativity: A Source–Readout Reconstruction of Einstein’s 1916 Theory. Read the original PDF alongside the web treatment.