Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Sealed or Leaky Section 6

Deterministic completions require unresolved information

Section 7 of 17

6 Deterministic completions require unresolved information

Theorem 6.1 (Conditional randomness and completion size)

Status: Proved.

Let S,TS,T be standard Borel spaces, let P\Prb be a probability law on SS, let T0=p(S0)T_0=p(S_0) for a measurable pp, and let a future finite-valued record be a measurable deterministic function R=R(S0)R=R(S_0).

  1. If RR is binary, write q(T0)=P(R=1∣T0)q(T_0)=\Prb(R=1\mid T_0). The minimum probability of error of a measurable deterministic predictor of RR from T0T_0 is

    inf⁡hP{R≠h(T0)}=Emin⁡{q(T0),1−q(T0)}. \inf_h\Prb\{R\ne h(T_0)\} =\E\min\{q(T_0),1-q(T_0)\}.

    If this is positive, RR does not descend almost surely through pp; on a positive-measure set of readout fibers there are source states with different records.

  2. If a finite-valued completion variable ZZ makes R=f(T0,Z)R=f(T_0,Z) almost surely, then, with entropy in bits,

    H(Z∣T0)≥H(R∣T0). H(Z\mid T_0)\ge H(R\mid T_0).

    In particular, a conditionally uniform nn-bit record requires at least nn bits of conditional completion entropy and ∣Z∣≥2n|\mathcal Z|\ge2^n.

  3. At a fixed readout tt, suppose a deterministic simulator uses at most MM values of ZZ. If its record law is within ε\varepsilon in total variation of the uniform law on {0,1}n\{0,1\}^n, then

    M≥(1−ε)2n. M\ge(1-\varepsilon)2^n.

    The bound is sharp when M≤2nM\le2^n: a uniform distribution on any MM record strings has distance 1−M/2n1-M/2^n from the uniform target.

Proof

Conditionally on T0=tT_0=t, predicting 00 incurs error q(t)q(t) and predicting 11 incurs 1−q(t)1-q(t); the measurable threshold predictor at q=1/2q=1/2 attains their minimum. Standard Borel regular conditional laws of S0S_0 given T0=tT_0=t are concentrated on p−1(t)p^{-1}(t) for almost every tt. Where 0<q(t)<10<q(t)<1, they assign positive mass to both possible record values, supplying the two points in the fiber. For part 2, determinism gives H(R∣T0,Z)=0H(R\mid T_0,Z)=0. The chain rule then yields H(Z∣T0)=H(R∣T0)+H(Z∣R,T0)≥H(R∣T0)H(Z\mid T_0)=H(R\mid T_0)+H(Z\mid R,T_0)\ge H(R\mid T_0). For part 3, the output support AA contains at most MM strings. Its simulator probability is one whereas its uniform probability is at most M/2nM/2^n, so total variation is at least 1−M/2n1-M/2^n. Direct summation gives the stated equality example.

□

This strengthens a qualitative non-source witness into an information requirement for deterministic completions. Its premises must not be misread. A statistical record law is not an empirical proof of universal determinism or of irreducibility relative to every possible initial description. A stochastic source model remains an alternative; a continuous hidden variable with unlimited precision also evades a finite cardinality bound. The result counts all unresolved apparatus and environmental information used by the simulator. Fresh random seeds cannot be omitted from ZZ while still calling that simulator deterministic. For a prescribed programme, future readout randomness conditional on the present state excludes a deterministic autonomous law on that state, but does not exclude an autonomous stochastic law or a history representation.