Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Section 4 9 October 2026

Conforming approximation and the original history law

Reading position 5 of 16

4 Conforming approximation and the original history law

The following limit result needs neither pointwise convergence of velocities near nodes nor a uniform high derivative bound on the approximating waves. It does need their complete local currents and their unchanged entrance.

Theorem 4.1 (Strong-density/current path limit)

Let Πn\Pi_n be reference-compatible path laws for conservative pairs (ρn,jn)(\rho_n,j_n) on the common ambient configuration space. They may, in particular, be the deterministic flows of smooth conforming regularizations. Suppose

ρn(0)=ρ0,sup⁡t∈[0,T]∥ρn(t)−ρ(t)∥1⟶0,∥jn−j∥L1(dt dx)⟶0,sup⁡n∫0T ⁣∫∣jn∣2ρn dx dt≤A∗<∞.\begin{align}\rho_n(0)&=\rho_0,\notag\\ \sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\rho_n(t)-\rho(t)\|_1&\longrightarrow0,\qquad \|j_n-j\|_{L^1(dt\,dx)}\longrightarrow0,\tag{4.1}\\ \sup_n\int_0^T\!\int\frac{|j_n|^2}{\rho_n}\,dx\,dt &\leq A_*<\infty. \notag\end{align}

Assume ρ,j\rho,j have the conservative continuity, node-zero and normalization properties above. Then {Πn}\{\Pi_n\} is tight in C\mathcal C and every weak limit is a reference-compatible path law for b=j/ρb=j/\rho, concentrated on finite-action curves.

For any single original f0∈L1(ρ0 dx)f_0\in L^1(\rho_0\,dx) as in (2.3), the measures f0(e0)Πnf_0(e_0)\Pi_n converge along the same subsequence to f0(e0)Πf_0(e_0)\Pi. If the limiting parent satisfies Assumption 3.1 and the boundary avoidance conditions, then the whole sequence converges to the unique deterministic reference law of Theorem 3.3; the same holds for its original-law reweighting. Different approximation sequences satisfying these hypotheses select the same limiting path law.

Proof

For a continuous path define

I(γ)=sup⁡P∑k=1m∣γ(tk)−γ(tk−1)∣2tk−tk−1, I(\gamma)=\sup_{\mathcal P} \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{|\gamma(t_k)-\gamma(t_{k-1})|^2}{t_k-t_{k-1}},

where the supremum runs over finite partitions of [0,T][0,T]. It is lower semicontinuous in the uniform topology, being a supremum of continuous functions. It equals ∫∣γ˙∣2\int|\dot\gamma|^2 for absolutely continuous paths with square-integrable derivative and is infinite otherwise. To see the nontrivial implication, a finite bound on the displayed sums bounds the functional formed by pairing increments with arbitrary step functions in the L2L^2 norm. Riesz representation gives an L2L^2 vector field vv with γ(t)−γ(s)=∫stv\gamma(t)-\gamma(s)=\int_s^t v; approximation by step functions then identifies the supremum with ∫∣v∣2\int|v|^2.

By (4.1), EΠnI≤A∗\mathbb E_{\Pi_n}I\leq A_*. Given a small probability tolerance, choose a compact entrance set and a large action threshold. Outside their exceptional sets the paths obey

∣γ(t)−γ(s)∣≤∣t−s∣1/2I(γ)1/2,sup⁡t∣γ(t)∣≤∣γ(0)∣+TI(γ). |\gamma(t)-\gamma(s)|\leq |t-s|^{1/2}I(\gamma)^{1/2}, \qquad \sup_t|\gamma(t)|\leq|\gamma(0)|+\sqrt{TI(\gamma)} .

Arzelà–Ascoli makes the resulting closed family compact. The entrance is fixed and hence tight; Markov controls the action exception. This proves tightness. If Πnk⇒Π\Pi_{n_k}\Rightarrow\Pi, continuity of each evaluation map and the uniform density convergence give (et)#Π=ρt dx(e_t)_\#\Pi=\rho_t\,dx at every time. Lower semicontinuity gives EΠI≤A∗\mathbb E_\Pi I\leq A_*.

It remains to identify the true integral equation. For a bounded continuous spacetime vector field gg, the exact identity and triangle inequality give

∫∣bn−g∣ρn=∫∣jn−gρn∣≤∥jn−j∥1+∥g∥∞∥ρn−ρ∥1+∫∣b−g∣ρ.\begin{align}\int|b_n-g|\rho_n &=\int|j_n-g\rho_n|\notag\\ &\leq\|j_n-j\|_1+\|g\|_\infty\|\rho_n-\rho\|_1 +\int|b-g|\rho . \tag{4.2}\end{align}

All these integrals are over spacetime. For any fixed rational time tt, the bounded functional

Ftg(γ)=1∧∣γ(t)−γ(0)−∫0tg(s,γ(s)) ds∣ F^g_t(\gamma)= 1\wedge\left|\gamma(t)-\gamma(0) -\int_0^t g(s,\gamma(s))\,ds\right|

is continuous in uniform path topology. Uniformly convergent paths have images in one compact set, where gg is uniformly continuous. The integral equation under Πn\Pi_n bounds EΠnFtg\mathbb E_{\Pi_n}F^g_t by the left side of (4.2). Passing to the weak limit yields EΠFtg≤∫∣b−g∣ρ\mathbb E_\Pi F^g_t\leq\int|b-g|\rho. The finite measure ρt dx dt\rho_t\,dx\,dt admits bounded continuous approximation of its integrable field bb in L1L^1. By the limiting marginals, replacing gg by bb in the path functional changes its expectation by at most ∫∣b−g∣ρ\int|b-g|\rho. Therefore EΠFtb=0\mathbb E_\Pi F^b_t=0. Fubini also gives ∫0T∣b(t,γ(t))∣dt<∞\int_0^T|b(t,\gamma(t))|dt<\infty for almost every path. A countable intersection over rational times, path continuity and continuity of its indefinite integral establish the true integral equation at every endpoint.

For the last assertion choose bounded continuous fmf_m with ∥f0−fm∥L1(ρ0)→0\|f_0-f_m\|_{L^1(\rho_0)}\to0, using truncation first if necessary. For every bounded continuous path observable FF,

∣∫F(f0−fm)(e0) dΠn∣≤∥F∥∞∥f0−fm∥L1(ρ0), \left|\int F(f_0-f_m)(e_0)\,d\Pi_n\right| \leq\|F\|_\infty\|f_0-f_m\|_{L^1(\rho_0)} ,

uniformly in nn, and the same estimate holds for Π\Pi. For fixed mm, Ffm(e0)Ff_m(e_0) is bounded continuous and passes to the limit. Letting m→∞m\to\infty proves convergence of the original reweightings. If the limiting reference law is unique, tightness and uniqueness of every subsequential limit give convergence of the entire sequence. Applying the same approximation argument to that sequence gives the original-law conclusion.

□

The equality of entrance densities is load-bearing for measurable f0f_0. If a regularization changes that entrance, an additional initial-law transfer estimate is required. Likewise a particle Galerkin approximation with a nonlocal projected generator cannot declare its projected wave to have the unprojected local current. It must first earn a conservative complete-current approximation of the form (4.1).

Lemma 4.2 (From a common physical form to density/current convergence)

Consider the same canonical coefficients and covariant derivatives for normalized waves Ψ,Ψ~\Psi,\widetilde\Psi, and put u=Ψ−Ψ~u=\Psi-\widetilde\Psi, e=∥u∥2e=\|u\|_2, KΨ=∑i∫λi∥DiΨ∥2K_\Psi=\sum_i\int\lambda_i\|D_i\Psi\|^2 and Ku=∑i∫λi∥Diu∥2K_u=\sum_i\int\lambda_i\|D_i u\|^2. If 0<λi≤Λ0<\lambda_i\leq\Lambda, then

∥ρ−ρ~∥1≤2e,∥j−j~∥1≤2Λ{eKΨ+Ku}. \|\rho-\widetilde\rho\|_1\leq2e,\qquad \|j-\widetilde j\|_1 \leq2\sqrt\Lambda\{e\sqrt{K_\Psi}+\sqrt{K_u}\}. (4.3)

Hence strong convergence in the common physical kinetic form, with a time-integrable uniform form bound, supplies the current convergence and action bound in Theorem 4.1.

Proof

Subtract the density as a bilinear expression and use the two unit L2L^2 norms. For the current write, componentwise,

ji−j~i=2λiIm⁡{⟨u,DiΨ⟩+⟨Ψ~,Diu⟩}. j_i-\widetilde j_i =2\lambda_i\operatorname{Im} \{\langle u,D_i\Psi\rangle +\langle\widetilde\Psi,D_i u\rangle\}.

Cauchy in the complete vector of coordinates, the inequality λi2≤Λλi\lambda_i^2\leq\Lambda\lambda_i, and then spatial Cauchy give (4.3). Integrate this estimate in time. The canonical action estimate follows from Proposition 3.4, or directly from ∣j∣2/ρ≤4Λ∑iλi∣DiΨ∣2|j|^2/\rho\leq4\Lambda\sum_i\lambda_i|D_i\Psi|^2.

□

A common-form approximation theorem for an actual Hamiltonian must establish the strong form convergence in this lemma; Hilbert norm convergence of waves alone does not establish it. Bounded multiplication regularizations of value jumps can be handled by their same-entrance Duhamel and work identities, provided their physical common form and uniform kinetic floor are proved. High graph regularity, when used to produce a classical flow for each approximation, is a separate fixed-approximation domain obligation; it need not be uniform in the limit.

Example 4.3 (Small wave and density errors with a nonvanishing current error)

On the one-dimensional torus with normalized Haar measure, take the free Hamiltonian −12∂x2-\frac12\partial_x^2 and exact waves

Ψn(t,x)=1+n−1ei(nx−n2t/2)1+n−2,Ψ(t,x)=1,n≥4. \Psi_n(t,x)=\frac{1+n^{-1}e^{i(nx-n^2t/2)}}{\sqrt{1+n^{-2}}}, \qquad\Psi(t,x)=1,\qquad n\geq4 .

They satisfy ∥Ψn−Ψ∥22=2−2/1+n−2≤n−2\|\Psi_n-\Psi\|_2^2=2-2/\sqrt{1+n^{-2}}\leq n^{-2} and ∥ρn−1∥∞≤2/n\|\rho_n-1\|_\infty\leq2/n, uniformly in time. Their currents are

jn(t,x)=cos⁡(nx−n2t/2)+n−11+n−2,j=0. j_n(t,x)=\frac{\cos(nx-n^2t/2)+n^{-1}}{1+n^{-2}}, \qquad j=0.

The action density estimate jn2/ρn≤∣∂xΨn∣2j_n^2/\rho_n\leq|\partial_x\Psi_n|^2 yields total action at most TT. Nevertheless

∥jn(t)∥1≥2/π−1/n1+n−2≥411>13, \|j_n(t)\|_1 \geq\frac{2/\pi-1/n}{1+n^{-2}} \geq\frac{4}{11}>\frac13 ,

using π<22/7\pi<22/7 and n≥4n\geq4. Thus even uniform wave and density convergence together with a uniform action bound does not imply strong complete-current convergence. These waves have different entrance waves, and the example is not a counterexample to Theorem 4.1; it isolates the independent current hypothesis in that theorem.