Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Section 9 4 October 2026

An autonomous clock and faithful copying cuts

Reading position 10 of 17

9 An autonomous clock and faithful copying cuts

The pilot mechanism is applied to one finite graph containing the source, apparatus, all receiving systems, inaccessible reference and a clock. The following construction specifies its material Hamiltonian and proves an actual historical-record property of its Bell limit. No continuum pointer law or classical reader of a pilot coordinate is appended. Circuit Hamiltonians and engineered state-transfer chains provide useful context [9, 10]; all facts used here are proved below.

9.1 Exact autonomous propagation

Let U0,…,Uℓ−1U_0,\ldots,U_{\ell-1} be fixed unitaries on a finite material space K\mathcal K, including every resource and a reference RR. During the portion declared to have an inaccessible reference, each gate acts as the identity on RR. Proposition 10.2 also permits an explicit earlier preparation stage involving RR. Set

V0=I,Vn=Un−1⋯U0,cn=(n+1)(ℓ−n). V_0=I,\qquad V_n=U_{n-1}\cdots U_0,\qquad c_n=\sqrt{(n+1)(\ell-n)}. (33)

The clock has basis ∣0⟩,…,∣ℓ⟩|0\rangle,\ldots,|\ell\rangle. For a frequency Ω>0\Omega>0, define the static matrix

HF=ℏΩ∑n=0ℓ−1cn(∣n+1⟩⟨n∣⊗Un+∣n⟩⟨n+1∣⊗Un†). H_F=\hbar\Omega\sum_{n=0}^{\ell-1}c_n \left(|n+1\rangle\langle n|\otimes U_n+ |n\rangle\langle n+1|\otimes U_n^\dagger\right). (34)

All its matrix edges are ordinary edges of the common canonical field. In particular, the pilot link meters and reactions use the currents of this complete HFH_F, rather than those of a source Hamiltonian with an external ideal clock suppressed.

Theorem 9.1 (Exact finite-clock programme)

Starting with ∣0⟩⊗ψ|0\rangle\otimes\psi, ∥ψ∥=1\|\psi\|=1, the field under (34) is

Ψ(t)=∑n=0ℓϕn(t)∣n⟩⊗Vnψ,ϕn(t)=(−i)n(ℓn)cos⁡ℓ−n(Ωt)sin⁡n(Ωt).\begin{align} \Psi(t)&=\sum_{n=0}^{\ell}\phi_n(t)|n\rangle\otimes V_n\psi,\tag{35}\\ \phi_n(t)&=(-i)^n\sqrt{\binom\ell n} \cos^{\ell-n}(\Omega t)\sin^n(\Omega t). \notag\end{align}

At the first transfer time

T=π2Ω, T=\frac{\pi}{2\Omega}, (36)

the state is (−i)ℓ∣ℓ⟩⊗Vℓψ(-i)^\ell|\ell\rangle\otimes V_\ell\psi. Moreover HF+ℏΩℓI≥0H_F+\hbar\Omega\ell I\ge0; this shift changes no configuration current. The clock and all its correlations remain in the full model.

Proof

With D=∑n∣n⟩⟨n∣⊗VnD=\sum_n|n\rangle\langle n|\otimes V_n,

D†HFD=HC⊗I,HC=ℏΩ∑ncn(∣n+1⟩⟨n∣+∣n⟩⟨n+1∣). D^\dagger H_FD=H_C\otimes I,\qquad H_C=\hbar\Omega\sum_nc_n (|n+1\rangle\langle n|+|n\rangle\langle n+1|).

On the permutation-symmetric subspace of ℓ\ell qubits, HCH_C is the restriction of ℏΩ∑j=1ℓXj\hbar\Omega\sum_{j=1}^\ell X_j; the normalized state with nn excitations has the displayed adjacent matrix element cnc_n. Evolving ∣0⟩⊗ℓ|0\rangle^{\otimes\ell} therefore gives (cos⁡(Ωt)∣0⟩−isin⁡(Ωt)∣1⟩)⊗ℓ(\cos(\Omega t)|0\rangle-i\sin(\Omega t)|1\rangle)^{\otimes\ell}. Its normalized symmetric coefficients prove (35) and (36). The spectrum of the qubit sum lies in [−ℏΩℓ,ℏΩℓ][-\hbar\Omega\ell,\hbar\Omega\ell], proving the lower bound.

□
Proposition 9.2 (Input-independent shape of the clock weights)

For each complete material basis state xx,

wn,x(t)=(ℓn)cos⁡2(ℓ−n)(Ωt)sin⁡2n(Ωt) ∣(Vnψ)x∣2. w_{n,x}(t)=\binom\ell n\cos^{2(\ell-n)}(\Omega t) \sin^{2n}(\Omega t)\,|(V_n\psi)_x|^2. (37)

On [0,T][0,T], each positive regular level of each weight has at most two crossings, independently of the unknown input. On [0,2T][0,2T] it has at most four. Every nonzero coordinate has strictly positive weight in the interior of the first pass; a vanishing coefficient (Vnψ)x(V_n\psi)_x gives an identically empty coordinate instead.

Proof

The factor depending on ψ\psi is a nonnegative constant. For 0<n<ℓ0<n<\ell, logarithmic differentiation of the other factor gives 2Ω[ncot⁡(Ωt)−(ℓ−n)tan⁡(Ωt)]2\Omega[n\cot(\Omega t)-(\ell-n)\tan(\Omega t)], which vanishes once, at sin⁡2(Ωt)=n/ℓ\sin^2(\Omega t)=n/\ell, and changes from positive to negative. For n=0n=0 or ℓ\ell the factor is monotone. Reflection around TT gives the second-pass count. Positivity on (0,T)(0,T) follows directly from (37).

□

The crossing count is a useful uniform input fact for a kinetic estimate. By itself it is not a proof of every other uniform constant required by that estimate.

9.2 A faithful archive is created at a monomial clock cut

A unitary is monomial in the complete material basis when

(Um)yx=eiϑx 1{y=π(x)} (U_m)_{yx}=e^{i\vartheta_x}\,1_{\{y=\pi(x)\}} (38)

for a permutation π\pi. Reversible copies and SWAPs are examples.

Theorem 9.3 (Historical record at a monomial cut)

For the Bell process of (34) in initial equilibrium, a monomial cut mm is crossed exactly once, from clock mm to clock m+1m+1, almost surely before TT. At that crossing the actual material configuration is updated by π\pi. The material state immediately before the crossing has law ∣(Vmψ)x∣2|(V_m\psi)_x|^2.

Suppose this permutation copies a working key WW into a blank archive AA, all earlier gates preserve its blank state, and all later gates preserve the archive label. Then the actual archive contains the actual WW key at that crossing and stays unchanged for the rest of the first pass. A later monomial SWAP into a retained blank receiver transfers the actual old working key into that receiver at its own unique crossing.

Proof

Write ϕn=(−i)nan\phi_n=(-i)^n a_n with an(t)>0a_n(t)>0 on (0,T)(0,T), and put ξn=Vnψ\xi_n=V_n\psi. The fine current at a complete edge across cut mm is

J(m+1,y),(m,x)(t)=2Ωcmam+1amRe⁡[(ξm+1)y∗(Um)yx(ξm)x]. J_{(m+1,y),(m,x)}(t)=2\Omega c_ma_{m+1}a_m \operatorname{Re}\left[(\xi_{m+1})_y^*(U_m)_{yx}(\xi_m)_x\right]. (39)

For (38), the nonzero real factor is exactly ∣(ξm)x∣2|(\xi_m)_x|^2. Every current across that cut is therefore forward, and its reverse Bell rate vanishes. Since the clock initially lies below the cut and finally lies above it with probability one, the cut is crossed exactly once. The permitted edge carries exactly the permutation π\pi.

Summing the forward current over xx gives 2Ωcmam+1am2\Omega c_ma_{m+1}a_m. It is the time derivative of the field mass strictly above the cut and integrates to one. Integrating the individual current thus gives ∣(ξm)x∣2|(\xi_m)_x|^2 for the pre-crossing material state. Once the process has crossed, it cannot return to the earlier region. All edges in the remaining region preserve AA by the later-gate hypothesis. This proves the historical statement. The same argument applies to the receiver SWAP.

□

For completeness, the crossing-time density is 2Ωcmam+1(t)am(t)2\Omega c_ma_{m+1}(t)a_m(t). Under z=sin⁡2(Ωt)z=\sin^2(\Omega t) it becomes

zm(1−z)ℓ−m−1B(m+1,ℓ−m)  dz. \frac{z^m(1-z)^{\ell-m-1}}{B(m+1,\ell-m)}\,\dd z.

This is a derived clock-time law, not an additional random time draw.

Remark 9.4 (Fine traffic is not coarse clock traffic)

For a general unitary UmU_m, the real factor in (39) can be negative. The net clock flux can be forward while some fine edges point backward. For example, let a Hadamard act on SS in the state 2/3∣0,0R⟩+1/3∣1,+R⟩\sqrt{2/3}|0,0_R\rangle+\sqrt{1/3}|1,+_R\rangle. At the fine edge whose old and new source bits both equal one and whose reference bit is zero, the real factor is −1/12-1/12. Thus Theorem 9.3 uses the monomial hypothesis essentially. In particular, a later archive does not record every transient excursion of an earlier nonmonomial resource gate.