Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Chapter 32 Version 2

Conditional preparation by reversible source transport

Reading position 45 of 53

The required apparatus law is a conditional resource statement. A pointer with a correct marginal distribution can remain correlated with a controller that predicts its future detector output. This chapter proves the finite nodal extraction result of [M19], retaining its physical archive, and separates it from global equilibration. The next chapter gives two different statistical alternatives and the complete detector integration.

32.1 The resource to be prepared

At handoff, let UU be the ready configuration and let AA contain every old preparation record, controller coordinate, exported cell label, and future-active memory. Internal quantum memories and an inaccessible reference remain in the wave. For a known normalized ready packet ϕ\phi, the target is

QU,A(du,da)=ϕ(u)2duPA(da).Q_{U,A}(du,da)=|\phi(u)|^2du\,P_A(da). (32.1)

The archive has its actual marginal PAP_A, which may be very far from the wave norm distribution. Equation (32.1) is therefore a conditional ready-subsystem target, not a global equilibrium measure.

All comparisons use TV(P,Q)=supEP(E)Q(E)=12PQ1\operatorname{TV}(P,Q)=\sup_E|P(E)-Q(E)|=\frac12\|P-Q\|_1. For standard Borel conditional laws with the same archive marginal,

TV(PU,A,QU,A)=TV(PUa,ϕ2du)PA(da).\operatorname{TV}(P_{U,A},Q_{U,A}) =\int\operatorname{TV}(P_{U|a},|\phi|^2du)\,P_A(da). (32.2)

This equality is an average conditional guarantee. It supplies no uniform statement on arbitrary rare archive values.

Proposition 32.1 (Reversible fine-grained obstruction)

Let StS_t be a common invertible measurable guidance flow with measurable inverse, and let its wave reference law be equivariant: Qt=(St)Q0Q_t=(S_t)_*Q_0. For any actual law Pt=(St)P0P_t=(S_t)_*P_0,

TV(Pt,Qt)=TV(P0,Q0). \operatorname{TV}(P_t,Q_t)=\operatorname{TV}(P_0,Q_0).

If P0=fQ0P_0=fQ_0, then

dPtdQt=fSt1,α ⁣(dPtdQt)dQt=α(f)dQ0 \frac{dP_t}{dQ_t}=f\circ S_t^{-1},\qquad \int\alpha\!\left(\frac{dP_t}{dQ_t}\right)dQ_t =\int\alpha(f)dQ_0

for every defined integral on either side. Singular components are preserved.

Proof

For every measurable event EE, Pt(E)=P0(St1E)P_t(E)=P_0(S_t^{-1}E) and likewise for QQ. The measurable bijection carries the full collection of events onto itself, so taking suprema proves the total-variation identity without any absolute-continuity assumption. In the density case, change variables in St1EfdQ0\int_{S_t^{-1}E}f\,dQ_0 to obtain the displayed Radon–Nikodym derivative. A further change of variables proves the integral identity. Null sets and their inverse images preserve singularity.

Coarse-grained relaxation, including established pilot-wave relaxation studies such as [VW], does not contradict this statement. Fine-grained information may move to unresolved scales or exported coordinates while a restricted class of observables becomes insensitive.

Lemma 32.2 (Same-wave complete future comparison)

Two preparations with the same complete wave and control programme, and configuration-law distance at most δ\delta, have final complete-output distance at most δ\delta under any common measurable source evolution and record map. The same holds for a common stochastic kernel. Returning waves, copies, nulls, physical timestamps, and adaptive records may be included.

Proof

A deterministic output event is a preimage under the common map. For a kernel, its probability for an output event is a measurable function in [0,1][0,1]; integrating that function against PQP-Q has absolute value at most TV(P,Q)\operatorname{TV}(P,Q). The complete actual path itself can be the output whenever the evolution assigns a measurable path.

This lemma compares to the same-wave hybrid law (32.1). It does not establish that this hybrid law predicts Born records after arbitrary activation of a nonequilibrium archive.

Lemma 32.3 (Normalization cost)

If TV(P,Q)δ\operatorname{TV}(P,Q)\le\delta, p=P(E)p=P(E), q=Q(E)q=Q(E) and p,q>0p,q>0, then

TV(P(E),Q(E))min{1,δ/max(p,q)}. \operatorname{TV}(P(\cdot|E),Q(\cdot|E)) \le\min\{1,\delta/\max(p,q)\}.
Proof

Assume pqp\ge q. The measures have common mass at least 1δ1-\delta. Their common mass outside EE is at most 1p1-p, so the common mass inside EE is at least pδp-\delta. Dividing both measures by their own probabilities leaves common conditional mass at least (pδ)/p(p-\delta)/p, since qpq\le p. Subtraction from one proves the bound. Interchange PP and QQ for the other ordering.

32.2 Explicit nodal resource and admitted initial laws

Fix N2N\ge2 and 0<η<1/20<\eta<1/2. Define on (0,1)(0,1)

aη(u)={sin(πu/(2η)),0<u<η,1,ηu1η,sin(π(1u)/(2η)),1η<u<1,ϕη(u)=aη(u)1η, a_\eta(u)= \begin{cases} \sin(\pi u/(2\eta)),&0<u<\eta,\\ 1,&\eta\le u\le1-\eta,\\ \sin(\pi(1-u)/(2\eta)),&1-\eta<u<1, \end{cases} \qquad \phi_\eta(u)=\frac{a_\eta(u)}{\sqrt{1-\eta}},

extended by zero. It is normalized, symmetric about 1/21/2, and belongs to H1(R)H^1(\mathbb R). Direct integration gives

ϕη22=π24η(1η),dη:=TV(ϕη2du,du)η.\|\phi_\eta'\|_2^2=\frac{\pi^2}{4\eta(1-\eta)},\qquad d_\eta:=\operatorname{TV}(|\phi_\eta|^2du,du)\le\eta. (32.3)

For the second inequality, min(ϕη2,1)aη2\min(|\phi_\eta|^2,1)\ge a_\eta^2, whose integral is 1η1-\eta.

The known seed wave is an array of NN identical cells:

φN,η(x)=ϕη(Nxk),xIk=(k/N,(k+1)/N).\varphi_{N,\eta}(x)=\phi_\eta(Nx-k),\qquad x\in I_k=(k/N,(k+1)/N). (32.4)

It has norm one, exact nodes at cell boundaries, and φN,η22=N2ϕη22\|\varphi_{N,\eta}'\|_2^2=N^2\|\phi_\eta'\|_2^2. Supplying this coherent wave is a preparation resource. The construction does not claim to shape an arbitrary unknown wave into it without cost.

Add an internal tag with ready state r|r\rangle and NN labels k|k\rangle. Add an archive coordinate yy with known H1H^1 wave χ\chi, supported on [0,1][0,1] and positive in its interior. Its actual configuration distribution need not be equilibrium. Let zz collect its actual initial value, every old coordinate and classical history, with a standard Borel reference measure μ\mu. The complete initial wave is φN,η(x)χ(y)rΞ(zold)\varphi_{N,\eta}(x)\chi(y)|r\rangle\Xi(z_{\rm old}), with the unknown input and inaccessible reference inside Ξ\Xi. Assume the actual law has density

P0(dx,dz)=f(x,z)dxμ(dz),f0,f=1,M:=Varxf(,z)μ(dz)<.P_0(dx,dz)=f(x,z)\,dx\,\mu(dz),\quad f\ge0,\quad \int f=1, \qquad M:=\int\operatorname{Var}_x f(\cdot,z)\,\mu(dz)<\infty. (32.5)

All actual values lie on the nonzero-wave supports needed for the stated flow. No target wave density appears in (32.5). Multimodal distributions, steps, and correlations are allowed. An exact old copy Z=XZ=X is excluded because its conditional law is singular. Regularity of the unconditional XX marginal would not suffice.

32.3 The source interaction and exact actual routing

First tag the occupied cell coherently, for time τ1\tau_1:

Htag(x)=π2τ1k1Ik(x)(kr+rk). H_{\rm tag}(x)=\frac{\pi\hbar}{2\tau_1} \sum_k1_{I_k}(x)(|k\rangle\langle r|+|r\rangle\langle k|).

It is a bounded multiplication operator, generates no configuration current, and sends r|r\rangle to ik-i|k\rangle on cell kk. The sharp coefficients are applied at exact nodes, so the wave remains H1H^1. Next use

Hy=b˙(t)kdkkkPy,d>1,b:01. H_y=\dot b(t)\sum_k dk\,|k\rangle\langle k|\otimes P_y, \qquad d>1,\quad b:0\longrightarrow1.

Only the tag kk is present at actual xIkx\in I_k, and the actual archive position becomes Y=Y+dkY'=Y+dk. The archive supports are now disjoint.

For time τ3\tau_3, apply the conditional dilation

HD=12kkk{vk(x),Px},vk(x)=a(xk/N),a=logNτ3. H_D=\frac12\sum_k|k\rangle\langle k|\{v_k(x),P_x\}, \qquad v_k(x)=a(x-k/N),\qquad a=\frac{\log N}{\tau_3}.

The scalar transport law

Hv=i(vx+v/2),J=vΦ2,Φt(x)=(St1)(x)Φ0(St1x)H_v=-i\hbar(v\partial_x+v'/2),\quad J=v|\Phi|^2,\quad \Phi_t(x)=\sqrt{(S_t^{-1})'(x)}\,\Phi_0(S_t^{-1}x) (32.6)

follows by differentiating along characteristics. It multiplies xk/Nx-k/N by NN. A final conditional translation by k/N-k/N aligns the dilated cells. Thus the exact actual configuration map is

K=NX,U=NXK,Y=Y+dK.K=\lfloor NX\rfloor,\qquad U=NX-K,\qquad Y'=Y+dK. (32.7)

Although the ready coordinate packets overlap after alignment, the disjoint YY' supports identify the local tag component and hence its actual velocity. There is no discontinuous cutting of a connected nonzero-wave flow.

The complete final field is, up to a common phase,

Φf(u,y,zold)=ϕη(u)[1Nkχ(ydk)k]Ξ(zold).\Phi_f(u,y,z_{\rm old}) =\phi_\eta(u)\left[ \frac1{\sqrt N}\sum_k\chi(y-dk)|k\rangle\right] \Xi(z_{\rm old}). (32.8)

The factor N1/2N^{-1/2} is the dilation Jacobian. All unoccupied archive packets survive. On its support the retained archive A=(Y,zold)A=(Y',z_{\rm old}) determines KK and the old YY; this is why correlations with KK cannot be discarded.

Theorem 32.4 (Conditional nodal extraction)

The finite interaction above, applied to the initial class (32.5), succeeds with probability one and obeys

TV(PU,A,duPA)M4N,TV(PU,A,ϕη(u)2duPA)M4N+dηM4N+η.\begin{align}\operatorname{TV}(P_{U,A},du\,P_A)&\le\frac{M}{4N},\tag{32.9}\\ \operatorname{TV}(P_{U,A},|\phi_\eta(u)|^2du\,P_A) &\le\frac{M}{4N}+d_\eta \le\frac{M}{4N}+\eta. \tag{32.10}\end{align}

The comparison retains the actual archive marginal and holds uniformly for unknown carried inputs and inaccessible references on which the controls act as identity.

Proof

The interaction calculation proves (32.7) and (32.8). Retaining AA is equivalent to retaining (K,z)(K,z). Their joint density after routing is

g(u,k,z)=N1f((k+u)/N,z),m(k,z)=01g(u,k,z)du. g(u,k,z)=N^{-1}f((k+u)/N,z),\qquad m(k,z)=\int_0^1g(u,k,z)\,du.

For a bounded-variation function hh on (0,1)(0,1) with mean hˉ\bar h, Jensen's inequality and its variation measure give

01h(u)hˉdu0101h(u)h(v)dudv(0,1)2t(1t)Dh(dt)12Var(h).\begin{aligned}\int_0^1|h(u)-\bar h|\,du &\le\int_0^1\int_0^1|h(u)-h(v)|\,du\,dv\\ &\le\int_{(0,1)}2t(1-t)\,|Dh|(dt) \le\tfrac12\operatorname{Var}(h). \end{aligned}

The middle inequality follows by integrating the variation along intervals between uu and vv; for fixed tt the ordered pairs whose interval crosses tt have measure 2t(1t)2t(1-t). Apply it to h(u)=f((k+u)/N,z)h(u)=f((k+u)/N,z), integrate over zz, and sum over open cells. Their interior variation sums to at most the total variation. The Jacobian 1/N1/N and the factor one half in total variation yield M/(4N)M/(4N). Replacing uniform density by ϕη2|\phi_\eta|^2 costs dηd_\eta with unchanged PAP_A, proving the second inequality.

32.4 Resources, reproducibility, and sharp failure tests

The resource costs are N+1N+1 tag states, archive extent O(dN)O(dN), cell resolution 1/N1/N, edge resolution η/N\eta/N, and integrated dilation strain logN\log N. The exact seed gradient cost is

xφN,η22=N2π24η(1η).\|\partial_x\varphi_{N,\eta}\|_2^2 =\frac{N^2\pi^2}{4\eta(1-\eta)}. (32.11)

Translations and dilations are unbounded selfadjoint transport generators on their admitted domains. These statements give finite resources on the specified support and finite-gradient fields, not a bounded operator norm or a lower-bounded microscopic energy model. Exact nodes and the sharp tag coefficient are ideal spatial controls. A finite-bandwidth smooth replacement needs its own configuration-law estimate; a small wave norm error alone does not establish that estimate for nonequilibrium inputs.

A deterministic clock can drive these pulses without an equilibrium seed. Take a coordinate SS with generator PSP_S and a known compact wave entirely upstream of ordered pulse regions. Let H=PS+rwr(S)GrH=P_S+\sum_rw_r(S)G_r, with disjoint regions and fixed operators GrG_r. Then S˙=1\dot S=1, and each admitted initial clock position crosses the same complete pulse integrals by a common finite deadline. The ordered unitary is independent of that initial position. The final clock factors and belongs to AA. An incomplete clock traversal is a genuine failure branch, not the ready output.

For mm seed coordinates with product known waves, define integrated coordinate variations MiM_i of their joint actual density, conditioning on all other coordinates and old archives. Apply the preceding interaction separately to each coordinate. Then

TV(PU,A,i=1mϕηi(ui)2duPA)i=1m(Mi4Ni+ηi).\operatorname{TV}\left(P_{\mathbf U,A}, \prod_{i=1}^m|\phi_{\eta_i}(u_i)|^2d\mathbf u\,P_A\right) \le\sum_{i=1}^m\left(\frac{M_i}{4N_i}+\eta_i\right). (32.12)

To prove this, successively average the density over each rescaled UiU_i. Each averaging is an L1L^1 contraction and does not increase the integrated variation in another coordinate. Telescope the one-coordinate inequality, then change each uniform factor to its ready density. The result concerns a joint finite stock, not separate correct marginals.

For the required deformation f(x)=1+ϵ(2x1)f(x)=1+\epsilon(2x-1), ϵ1|\epsilon|\le1, the exact routed marginal and complete archive comparison are

fU(u)=1+ϵN(2u1),TV(PU,K,duPK)=ϵ4N.f_U(u)=1+\frac{\epsilon}{N}(2u-1),\qquad \operatorname{TV}(P_{U,K},du\,P_K)=\frac{|\epsilon|}{4N}. (32.13)

Indeed g(u,k)=N1[1+ϵ(2(k+u)/N1)]g(u,k)=N^{-1}[1+\epsilon(2(k+u)/N-1)], and subtracting its uu average leaves ϵ(2u1)/N2\epsilon(2u-1)/N^2 in each cell. Integration proves the TV identity. For a detector prepared in ϕη\phi_\eta, let Gη(u)=0uϕη2G_\eta(u)=\int_0^u|\phi_\eta|^2 and up=Gη1(1p)u_p=G_\eta^{-1}(1-p). Its terminal plus probability is

1up+ϵNup(1up). 1-u_p+\frac{\epsilon}{N}u_p(1-u_p).

At p=1/2p=1/2, symmetry gives exactly 1/2+ϵ/(4N)1/2+\epsilon/(4N); in general its Born error is at most dη+ϵ/(4N)d_\eta+|\epsilon|/(4N).

The admissible oscillatory rival fN(x)=1+ϵsin(2πNx)f_N(x)=1+\epsilon\sin(2\pi Nx) has M=4ϵNM=4|\epsilon|N. Its extracted marginal is 1+ϵsin(2πu)1+\epsilon\sin(2\pi u), so the balanced terminal error remains ϵ/π-\epsilon/\pi for every NN. This respects (32.10) and disproves a uniform statement over arbitrary absolutely continuous initial laws. Wave smoothness alone does not constrain the independent actual density variation.

For even NN, the retained archive also satisfies

P(KN/2)=12+ϵ4. \mathbb P(K\ge N/2)=\frac12+\frac{\epsilon}{4}.

Reversing all the preparation interactions restores the original wave and actual law exactly. A balanced reader on the returned seed therefore recovers the unsuppressed deviation ϵ/4\epsilon/4. The resource was prepared by exporting nonequilibrium, not by destroying it. This return is an explicitly allowed inverse, and it identifies the precise limit of any global equilibrium interpretation.