Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Chapter 13 Version 2

A common directed interaction for timing, continuation, and acquisition

Reading position 19 of 53

This chapter consolidates the directed-transport repair of the preceding null-writer model [M29]. Its elementary decay clock is replaced by conservative spatial transport and a prepared actual coordinate. The same derivative that causes effective incoming loss also changes the dynamics after a physical position copy. It is a complete conditional detector constitution, not an embedding of the old canonical actual carrier. Its directed, non-semibounded generator also differs from the later massive guidance construction and finite pilot theory.

13.1 Complete source and conservative Hamiltonian

Let K=SR\mathcal K=\mathcal S\otimes\mathcal R, with R\mathcal R inaccessible, and let AA be a projector on S\mathcal S. The cell space is

Hcell=L2(R;K)gL2(R;AK)c.\mathcal H_{\rm cell}=L^2(\mathbb R_-;\mathcal K)_g \oplus L^2(\mathbb R;A\mathcal K)_c. (13.1)

The gg mode is stationary and incoming. The cc mode moves right; its regions x<0x<0 and x>0x>0 are called reactive and spent. They are parts of one channel, not separate modes connected by a prescribed collapse. The incoming g/eg/e components remain coherent and share one actual position XX.

For fixed g>0g>0, v>0v>0 and real Δ\Delta, define

H(GC)=(gACx<0ivxC+Δ1x<0C+g1x<0AG),D(H)=L2(R;K)H1(R;AK).H\binom GC= \binom{\hbar g A C|_{x<0}} {-i\hbar v\partial_x C+\hbar\Delta1_{x<0}C+\hbar g1_{x<0}AG}, \quad D(H)=L^2(\mathbb R_-;\mathcal K)\oplus H^1(\mathbb R;A\mathcal K). (13.2)

The full experiment retains all active and spent fields, actual coordinates, copies, clock phases, unused cells, and supplied classical histories. A conditional source slice is not the whole state when waves can return.

Lemma 13.1 (Self-adjoint realization and current)

The operator (13.2) is self-adjoint. In the incoming region

tρ+xj=0,ρ=G2+C2,j=vC2, \partial_t\rho+\partial_xj=0, \qquad\rho=\|G\|^2+\|C\|^2,\qquad j=v\|C\|^2,

and on x>0x>0, ρ=C2\rho=\|C\|^2 and j=vρj=v\rho.

Proof

The diagonal operator 0(ivx)0\oplus(-i\hbar v\partial_x) is self-adjoint on the stated domain. Restriction and extension across the half-line form mutually adjoint bounded exchange blocks; detuning is bounded and real. The bounded self-adjoint perturbation theorem gives the result. In the local norm derivative the exchange terms cancel, the real detuning contributes zero, and the remaining term is vxC2-v\partial_x\|C\|^2. The full-line H1H^1 trace matches current across zero.

Prepare one unknown ΨK\Psi\in\mathcal K, Ψ=1\|\Psi\|=1, and

(G0,C0)=(χΨ,0),χ(x)=αeαx/2 (x<0),Pr(X0dx)=αeαxdx,(G_0,C_0)=(\chi\Psi,0),\qquad \chi(x)=\sqrt\alpha e^{\alpha x/2}\ (x<0),\qquad \Pr(X_0\in dx)=\alpha e^{\alpha x}dx, (13.3)

with α>0\alpha>0. The actual coordinate follows X˙=j/ρ\dot X=j/\rho. Both the guidance law and the squared-norm readiness are explicit statistical/mechanical commitments. There is no additional Born measurement of the source. The ready vector belongs to D(H)D(H), since the differentiated component is initially zero, and HΦ02=2g2AΨ2\|H\Phi_0\|^2=\hbar^2g^2\|A\Psi\|^2.

The ideal directed Hamiltonian is unbounded below. A finite ready energy variance does not make it a semibounded microscopic material model. No such bath realization is claimed. Prescribed switching and outgoing cam control remain resources.

13.2 Exact event law and retained source

Write p=AΨ2p=\|A\Psi\|^2, κ=αv\kappa=\alpha v, and define

u˙=ige,e˙=igu(κ/2+iΔ)e,(u(0),e(0))=(1,0),a=u2+e2.\dot u=-ige,\qquad \dot e=-igu-(\kappa/2+i\Delta)e, \qquad (u(0),e(0))=(1,0),\quad a=|u|^2+|e|^2. (13.4)

The next result derives this dissipative-looking equation from (13.2).

Theorem 13.2 (Common transport, waiting law, and continuation)

For (13.2)(13.3), the exact field is

G(x,t)=χ(x)[(IA)Ψ+u(t)AΨ],x<0,C(x,t)=χ(x)e(t)AΨ,x<0,C(x,t)=αe(tx/v)AΨ,0<x<vt,\begin{align}G(x,t)&=\chi(x)[(I-A)\Psi+u(t)A\Psi],&&x<0,\tag{13.5}\\ C(x,t)&=\chi(x)e(t)A\Psi,&&x<0,\tag{13.6}\\ C(x,t)&=\sqrt\alpha e(t-x/v)A\Psi,&&0<x<vt, \tag{13.7}\end{align}

with zero outgoing field for x>vtx>vt. If τ\tau is the first crossing of zero and Np=1p+paN_p=1-p+pa, then

Pr(τ>t)=Np(t),Pr(τdt)=κpe(t)2dt,Ψ(t)=(IA)Ψg+AΨ[u(t)g+e(t)e]Np(t),Ψτ=AΨ/p,XtX0=α1logNp(t),t<τ,L(Xtτ>t)=αeαx1x<0dx.\begin{align}\Pr(\tau>t)&=N_p(t),&\Pr(\tau\in dt)&=\kappa p|e(t)|^2dt,\tag{13.8}\\ \Psi_\varnothing(t)&=\frac{(I-A)\Psi\otimes g+ A\Psi\otimes[u(t)g+e(t)e]}{\sqrt{N_p(t)}}, &\Psi_\tau&=A\Psi/\sqrt p,\tag{13.9}\\ X_t-X_0&=-\alpha^{-1}\log N_p(t),&&t<\tau,\tag{13.10}\\ \mathcal L(X_t\mid\tau>t)&=\alpha e^{\alpha x}1_{x<0}dx. \tag{13.11}\end{align}

The daughter formula applies only when p>0p>0. Outgoing temporal amplitudes remain part of the complete field.

Proof

Substitute the incoming ansatz into Schrödinger evolution. Since χ=αχ/2\chi'=\alpha\chi/2, the transport derivative supplies precisely αve/2-\alpha ve/2 in the time equation. This gives (13.4). Forward characteristics and continuity at zero give the outgoing field. The front at x=vtx=vt is continuous because e(0)=0e(0)=0. Self-adjoint uniqueness identifies the solution.

The reduced equation gives a=κe2a'=-\kappa|e|^2. The incoming norm is NpN_p and the outgoing norm is pκ0te(s)2ds=1Npp\kappa\int_0^t|e(s)|^2ds=1-N_p. Current is nonnegative; a trajectory crosses at most once. More explicitly, the incoming velocity is independent of xx:

X˙=vpe2/Np=α1tlogNp. \dot X=vp|e|^2/N_p=-\alpha^{-1}\partial_t\log N_p.

Thus U=eαX0U=e^{\alpha X_0} is uniform and τ>t\tau>t iff U<Np(t)U<N_p(t). This proves the waiting law directly from the prepared actual coordinate. The incoming factorization and outgoing source orientation give the conditional vectors. A surviving coordinate xx came from x0=x+α1logNpx_0=x+\alpha^{-1}\log N_p; change of variables gives joint surviving density NpαeαxN_p\alpha e^{\alpha x}. Dividing by NpN_p proves the last line. At finite times a>0a>0, since the two-dimensional propagator is invertible, so finite nulls have no normalization singularity.

In the reaction-history filtration containing the occurrence time but no initial-coordinate record, the compensator is

0tτκpe(s)2Np(s)ds.\int_0^{t\wedge\tau}\frac{\kappa p|e(s)|^2}{N_p(s)}ds. (13.12)

Indeed conditional survival from ss to tt is Np(t)/Np(s)N_p(t)/N_p(s); differentiation gives the intensity. In the larger filtration revealing X0X_0 and the complete field, crossing is predictable. Its compensator is the predictable boundary count, not (13.12). Prepared configuration randomness has replaced intrinsic chemical randomness; these are different complete constitutions.

An actual finite output cam can be included on 0<x<0<x<\ell by

Hcam=v[px+cf(x)py],fCc(0,),0f(x)dx=1. H_{\rm cam}=v[p_x+c f(x)p_y],\qquad f\in C_c^\infty(0,\ell),\quad\int_0^\ell f(x)dx=1.

Its divergence-free characteristics have x˙=v\dot x=v, y˙=vcf(x)\dot y=vcf(x); each completed passage shifts the latch by cc. A ready latch packet narrower than c/3c/3 has disjoint unactuated and completed regions. The record completion time is τ+/v\tau+\ell/v. At a finite deadline, incomplete cams remain pending outputs. A clearance interval completes them without inventing a completed record at the earlier cut.

13.3 A physical copy changes the reaction through the same derivative

Prepare a memory packet η(y)\eta(y) of positive width and the actual joint coordinate law χ(x)2η(y)2dxdy|\chi(x)|^2|\eta(y)|^2dx\,dy, conditionally independent of the complete prior source and actual past. This is an additional ready-resource law, not a consequence of the product wave alone. Freeze the binding contact, then apply Hcopy(t)=ac(t)xpyH_{\rm copy}(t)=a_c(t)x p_y with acdt=1\int a_cdt=1. It is a source-blind coordinate acquisition. The complete new ready field is

G0(x,y)=χ(x)η(yx)Ψ,C0=0.G_0(x,y)=\chi(x)\eta(y-x)\Psi,\qquad C_0=0. (13.13)

During binding the memory coordinate is stationary and retained. In the Fourier convention η(z)=(2π)1/2eikzη^(k)dk\eta(z)=(2\pi)^{-1/2}\int e^{ikz}\widehat\eta(k)dk, put

Ut=F1[η^(k)uΔvk(t)],Vt=F1[η^(k)eΔvk(t)].U_t=\mathcal F^{-1}[\widehat\eta(k)u_{\Delta-vk}(t)],\qquad V_t=\mathcal F^{-1}[\widehat\eta(k)e_{\Delta-vk}(t)]. (13.14)

Subscripts denote detuning in (13.4).

Theorem 13.3 (Complete acquired-record and reaction law)

The exact incoming field after the copy is

Φ(x,y,t)=χ(x){η(yx)(IA)Ψg+AΨ[Ut(yx)g+Vt(yx)e]}.\Phi_-(x,y,t)=\chi(x)\{\eta(y-x)(I-A)\Psi\otimes g+ A\Psi\otimes[U_t(y-x)g+V_t(y-x)e]\}. (13.15)

Define

m(y)=0χ(x)2η(yx)2dx,b(y,t)=0χ(x)2(Ut(yx)2+Vt(yx)2)dx,sp(y,t)=(1p)m(y)+pb(y,t).\begin{align}m(y)&=\int_{-\infty}^0|\chi(x)|^2|\eta(y-x)|^2dx,\tag{13.16}\\ b(y,t)&=\int_{-\infty}^0|\chi(x)|^2 (|U_t(y-x)|^2+|V_t(y-x)|^2)dx,\tag{13.17}\\ s_p(y,t)&=(1-p)m(y)+pb(y,t). \tag{13.18}\end{align}

Then

Pr(ydy,τ>t)=sp(y,t)dy,Pr(ydy,τdt)=κpVt(y)2dydt,Pr(τ>ty)=sp(y,t)/m(y),hy(t)=1t<τκpVt(y)2/sp(y,t).\begin{align}\Pr(y\in dy,\tau>t)&=s_p(y,t)dy,\tag{13.19}\\ \Pr(y\in dy,\tau\in dt)&=\kappa p|V_t(y)|^2dy\,dt,\tag{13.20}\\ \Pr(\tau>t\mid y)&=s_p(y,t)/m(y),\tag{13.21}\\ h_y(t)&=1_{t<\tau}\kappa p|V_t(y)|^2/s_p(y,t). \tag{13.22}\end{align}

After an acquired yy and a null with sp(y,t)>0s_p(y,t)>0, the retained incoming vector is Φ(,y,t)/sp(y,t)\Phi_-(\cdot,y,t)/\sqrt{s_p(y,t)}. Conditional formulas are used only for m(y)>0m(y)>0 and positive survivor density, almost everywhere in the actual record law. Its spatial degree cannot be dropped if it can subsequently return.

Proof

Fourier transforming in yy writes the incoming profile as χ(x)eikxη^(k)\chi(x)e^{-ikx}\widehat\eta(k). Applying ivx-iv\partial_x contributes iκ/2vk-i\kappa/2-vk, so the bright detuning becomes Δvk\Delta-vk. Inverse Fourier transformation yields (13.15). Orthogonality of AΨA\Psi and (IA)Ψ(I-A)\Psi, including the reference, gives sps_p. The boundary flux at x=0x=0 is vαpVt(y)2v\alpha p|V_t(y)|^2, while integrated continuity gives tb=κVt(y)2\partial_tb=-\kappa|V_t(y)|^2. Conditioning on the initial memory density mm proves the final two formulas.

This is the connecting equation: copying position changes the spatial dependence, and the unchanged transport derivative changes the reaction law and continuation. The copy does not leave an independent classical displacement available for the old log-likelihood experiment. Discarding yy gives only the coarser survivor

1p+pa(t),a(t)=η^(k)2aΔvk(t)dk, 1-p+p\overline a(t),\qquad \overline a(t)=\int|\widehat\eta(k)|^2a_{\Delta-vk}(t)dk,

which cannot replace the record-conditioned law or its complex retained amplitudes.

Proposition 13.4 (Finite position resolution can suppress conversion)

For the Gaussian ησ(y)=(2πσ2)1/4ey2/(4σ2)\eta_\sigma(y)=(2\pi\sigma^2)^{-1/4}e^{-y^2/(4\sigma^2)}, if 4g2>κ2/44g^2>\kappa^2/4, then

Pr(τT)κpTσ2/πv4πg24g2κ2/4.\Pr(\tau\le T)\le \kappa pT\frac{\sigma\sqrt{2/\pi}}v \frac{4\pi g^2}{\sqrt{4g^2-\kappa^2/4}}. (13.23)

The bound is uniform in the fixed detuning Δ\Delta.

Proof

At detuning δ\delta, the two dissipative eigenvalues satisfy Reλ±0\operatorname{Re}\lambda_\pm\le0 and

eδ(t)=igeλ+teλtλ+λ,λ+λ2=(κ/2+iδ)24g2δ2+4g2κ2/4. e_\delta(t)=-ig\frac{e^{\lambda_+t}-e^{\lambda_-t}}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}, \quad |\lambda_+-\lambda_-|^2 =|(\kappa/2+i\delta)^2-4g^2| \ge\delta^2+4g^2-\kappa^2/4.

Therefore eδ(t)24g2/(δ2+4g2κ2/4)|e_\delta(t)|^2\le4g^2/(\delta^2+4g^2-\kappa^2/4). The Gaussian momentum density is bounded by σ2/π\sigma\sqrt{2/\pi}. Insert this bound into the integrated event density, change variable δ=Δvk\delta=\Delta-vk, and integrate the Lorentzian. Integration over [0,T][0,T] proves (13.23).

At (12.28) with κ=v=1\kappa=v=1, the coefficient is 15.941283pσ15.941283\,p\sigma. Thus p=2/3p=2/3, σ=103\sigma=10^{-3} gives conversion below 0.0106290.010629, whereas the uncopied contact converts with probability 1/31/3. Resolution improves at momentum cost Var(py)=2/(4σ2)\operatorname{Var}(p_y)=\hbar^2/(4\sigma^2). This is a finite acquisition/backaction consequence, not a universal tradeoff for all contacts. An active controller trying to undo the correlation must retain every copy in the new Hamiltonian calculation.

13.4 Null reuse and the preparation boundary

At (12.28), a source phase correction turns the endpoint bright amplitude 1/2-1/\sqrt2 into 1/21/\sqrt2 without changing the incoming spatial factor. The null coordinate distribution in Theorem 13.2 is again the ready exponential. Consequently the same unmeasured cell, after a null and a finite source phase correction of duration dd, admits mm attempts with

Pr(all m null)=1p+p2m,fk(s)=p2(k1)κe(s)2,0<s<T.\Pr(\hbox{all }m\hbox{ null})=1-p+p2^{-m},\qquad f_k(s)=p2^{-(k-1)}\kappa|e(s)|^2,\quad 0<s<T. (13.24)

Here fk(s)dsf_k(s)ds is the unconditional first-arrival mass at physical time (k1)(T+d)+s(k-1)(T+d)+s. The proof is multiplication of the actual null filter; there are no reactions while g=v=0g=v=0 in the phase windows. This is conditional renewal of an unmeasured exponential resource, not independence of successive nulls. After a position copy the factorization fails and Theorem 13.3 replaces (13.24). After capture the cell is spent.

Proposition 13.5 (Invariant incoming span selects a shape, not a probability law)

For constant nonzero gg and v>0v>0, a one-dimensional incoming spatial span {χ(x)ξ}\{\chi(x)\xi\} is invariant for every binding/source vector under the incoming differential expression if and only if

χ=zχ,χ(x)=2Rezezx,Rez>0, \chi'=z\chi,\qquad \chi(x)=\sqrt{2\operatorname{Re}z}\,e^{zx}, \quad\operatorname{Re}z>0,

up to a constant phase. The effective decay coefficient is 2vRez2v\operatorname{Re}z and detuning is Δ+vImz\Delta+v\operatorname{Im}z.

Proof

Applying the incoming generator to an ee component requires χ\chi' to lie in the same one-dimensional span. The weak equation χ=zχ\chi'=z\chi has only exponential solutions. Square integrability on the negative half-line requires positive real exponent and fixes normalization. Conversely substitution proves invariance and the displayed coefficients. With only initial gg support, the nonzero exchange creates an ee component and its next derivative imposes the same condition.

This characterizes a resource property. It does not prepare that resource from a broader class, select squared-norm actual coordinates, or establish universality of directed material transport.

The old three-contact experiment has a useful regression test. If only the present surviving clock coordinate is acquired after a null, its conditional law is the source-independent ready exponential. For Rj=cαXjR_j=-c\alpha X_j, the two surviving clocks are independent Exp(1/c)\operatorname{Exp}(1/c) variables conditional on the double-null source branch. Applying the same finite plate as before gives

θ=c/2er/cc(e0.45r/ce0.72r/c)dr, \theta=\int_{c/2}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-r/c}}c \left(e^{-0.45r/c}-e^{-0.72r/c}\right)dr,

independently of pp. The four source stopping masses remain (12.31); hence both ensembles in (12.30) have Pr(C=1)=θ/3\Pr(C=1)=\theta/3 and Pr(NNN,C=1)=θ/4\Pr(NNN,C=1)=\theta/4. A physical initial-coordinate copy instead obeys (13.22), with its changed timing and daughters. This distinction prevents using the unmeasured null displacement and a freely known initial position in the same experiment.

The supported chain for this directed cell is therefore

specified coherent field and interface Hamiltonian+ guidance and independent exponential squared-norm readiness actual first passage, null continuation, product field copy-dependent detuning and complete acquired-record law. \begin{gathered} \text{specified coherent field and interface Hamiltonian}\\ +\ \text{guidance and independent exponential squared-norm readiness}\\ \Longrightarrow\ \text{actual first passage, null continuation, product field}\\ \Longrightarrow\ \text{copy-dependent detuning and complete acquired-record law}. \end{gathered}

The original canonical Hamiltonian current and its actual carrier are absent from this cell's complete state. Adding Bell rates on an enlarged configuration would be a benchmark, not a derivation of that embedding. A conversion boundary flux is not the original Hamiltonian edge current, and the reaction-history intensity is not a law in the filtration revealing the actual ready coordinate. Complete material-field admission, guidance, readiness, and the ideal directed channel remain physical commitments of this cell. Its theorems do not close the canonical event-law bridge; the pilot construction addresses that bridge with a different complete state and microscopic mechanism, while the massive construction establishes a different operational event law.