Skip to content
Shadow Theory
Published constitutive resultsConsciousness / Psychophysical Constitution

Consciousness — SPC-2

Current research status · SPC-2 · Monograph and Papers 2–4

SPC-2 develops explicit laws for awareness, perspective admission, lived content and nonbranching subject continuation. The Version 2 monograph establishes its philosophical and constitutive foundation. Papers 2–4 advance the programme through relational-boundary robustness, effective interface learning and binary-realization identification. Their results distinguish reconstruction, physical implementation and phenomenal interpretation, and preserve the stated conditions of each theorem and computational comparison. The original finite completion theorem retains its certified-realization, selection-doctrine and A0–A3 premises. Biological interpretation and empirical assessment remain research targets. The earlier Consciousness Field account remains historical.

Current publications

The current consciousness account

SPC-2 separates awareness, a localized subject, a lived scene and a person. Its admission law requires executable return and native predictive conditions. Its content law uses all admitted finite native continuations and checked predictive-fibre congruence. Its continuation law follows nonbranching process provenance.

Conditional finite result

Given certified realization, its selection doctrine and the stated A0–A3 premises, the finite construction assigns qualifying perspectives, their full endogenous predictive content and episode continuation. The result does not derive those inputs.

Realization and validation

Physical realization selection, robust biological interpretation and comparison with experience remain obligations. The monograph supplies no universal consciousness detector and does not certify current LLM sessions.

Three advances in the research programme

Paper 2 · Relational boundaries →

The masking construction exposes a robustness vulnerability in exact boundary rules. Statistical deficiency, resource-sensitive comparison and composition theorems specify what a successor account must preserve. Operational equivalence also limits what observed laws can identify.

Paper 3 · Learning interfaces →

Finite software experiments separate representational capacity from producing and selecting an adequate model. The 48-system comparison preserves its registered results, mechanism-specific regressions and the distinct post-hoc fitting analysis.

Paper 4 · Identifying realizations →

Intervention-response laws recover an unknown binary coordinate chart under product-response and rank assumptions. A spectral certificate, recoding obstructions and a bounded PyPhi comparison sharpen the realization problem while retaining the distinction between an identified chart and an intrinsic grain.

Version 2 supersedes the earlier Consciousness Field account. Its older fixed-point and EEG claims remain identifiable history; they are not empirical validation of SPC-2. Quantum publications supply physical antecedents and related reading, with their own assumptions.

Research protocol. Within Shadow Theory, a result on this problem enters the framework through a dedicated public paper or record containing its assumptions, domain of validity, method, mathematical or empirical support, and exact conclusion. This page defines the target and connects the work that bears on it.