How to Read the Six-Paper Stack
A reading guide: what each paper assumes, what it proves, and the interfaces between them.
The stack is designed to be read in order. Each paper proves one step and hands a typed interface to the next; nothing downstream claims more than upstream results license.
Paper 1 — the distinction
Fix a realization/readout map from complete realization packages to bounded readouts. Two relations must be kept apart: the quotient presentation , which always holds for , and realization-structure equivalence, which requires admissible faithful recovery. Paper 1 proves these come apart, and pins down exactly when — including an equivariant no-selector theorem and explicit exception classes.
Theorem — Readout Non-Equivalence (informal)
If no admissible realization-faithful section of exists, the readout domain is not realization-structure equivalent to the package domain, even though it is an exact quotient of it.
Paper 2 — the brake
It is a recurring error to read Paper 1 as "readout loss is automatically a problem." Paper 2 proves the precise extra condition needed: a certified active failure of an essential public closure slot, with no checked repair or public surrogate. Without that certificate, no obstruction claim is licensed.
Paper 3 — conditional canonicality
Given a certified completion need, when is a proposed completion the completion? Exactly when it is a certified initial object in the public admissible completion category:
A canonicality criterion, not an existence theorem: completion need does not imply canonical completion.
Paper 4 — from object to artifact
A canonical completion object is still not a public artifact. Paper 4 defines the down-compiler — total, deterministic, route-legal, gate-cleared, residue-aware — and proves it emits exactly one statused output from an eight-member codomain that includes declared failure and residue outputs.
Paper 5 — the runtime
Paper 5 supplies the calculus that governs public claims after compilation: routes, status algebra, residue algebra, the equation-artifact grammar, claim licensing, dry-test audit, downgrade logic, and forbidden-promotion discipline. Its claim-cap theorems bound every emitted output.
Paper 6 — the synthesis
The capstone composes the five upstream interfaces into a single typed synthesis object and proves the Scoped Shadow Fixed-Point Law-Packet Theorem. That theorem is the precise, bounded sense in which the historical "Everything Equation" survives:
Licensed only as a scoped, residue-visible, status-certified, claim-bounded closure-fixed law packet — not as source-level equality or a solved theory of everything.