# Section 12: Conclusion

<!-- Complete paper-2 web edition. Mathematical macros used below:
\headrulewidth = 0.3pt
\TV = \operatorname{TV}
\Law = \operatorname{Law}
\dist = \operatorname{dist}
\Eff = \operatorname{Eff}_{*}
\supp = \operatorname{supp}
\id = \operatorname{id}
\E = \mathbb E
\Prb = \mathbb P
\Ftwo = \mathbb F_2
\calE = \mathcal E
\calR = \mathcal R
\calN = \mathcal N
\calF = \mathcal F
\calW = \mathcal W
\ploc = P_{\mathrm{loc}}
\qop = q_{\mathrm{op}}
\Lop = \mathscr L_{\mathcal E}
\Rstar = R^{\ast}
\SPC = \textnormal{SPC-2}
\eps = \varepsilon
\ind = \mathbf 1
\normone = \left\lVert#1\right\rVert_1
-->

<a id="section-12"></a>

## 12 Conclusion

<a id="sec:conclusion"></a> An exact relational candidate rule can be mathematically determinate and still be fragile under small changes in its underlying instruments. The masked encoder demonstrates that fragility in the published minimal-target projection: a tiny new singleton signal deletes a projected edge while substantial joint information and the contrast of a fixed scheduled return remain. A continuous weight cannot reproduce that exact positive support along the family.

Directed statistical deficiency supplies a different and stable information question. It distinguishes common-conditional padding from genuinely joint coding and gives an exact quantitative repair of the masking diagnostic. Separating that reconstruction question from native execution and resource-relative cut simulation prevents strong information, physical return and simulator obstruction from being treated as synonyms.

A realized relational process can be encapsulated through a strong marked interface when its joint record and successor-class laws close under the admitted interactions. Matching causal contexts then preserve complete finite histories, and controlled approximations incur explicit budgets. Transferring a cut profile demands more than target fidelity: the comparison processes must retain their resource meaning as well.

Finally, exact-law identification reaches only attributes constant on the declared operational-equivalence classes. Functional premises that leave a phenomenal predicate unconstrained do not determine it. SPC-2 already supplies a connecting constitutive premise; the present results audit the functional boundary beneath it rather than pretend that the premise was missing. The outcome is a strengthened and more transparent analysis of localization candidates, not a derived unique psychophysical replacement. It leaves the proposed awareness-first interpretation available for philosophical and empirical assessment while making the mathematical obligations independently inspectable.